Fire in the hole

rainbowrainbow Registered Users Posts: 2,765 Major grins
edited November 5, 2010 in Street and Documentary
1
1068312810_GLss3-XL.jpg

2
1068312865_X4cRq-XL.jpg

3
1068313003_kRw7o-XL.jpg

Comments

  • DonRicklinDonRicklin Registered Users Posts: 5,551 Major grins
    edited October 29, 2010
    Love them flames! thumb.gif

    What's cookin? headscratch.gif

    Don
    Don Ricklin - Gear: Canon EOS 5D Mark III, was Pentax K7
    'I was older then, I'm younger than that now' ....
    My Blog | Q+ | Moderator, Lightroom Forums | My Amateur Smugmug Stuff | My Blurb book Rust and Whimsy. More Rust , FaceBook     .
  • M38A1M38A1 Registered Users Posts: 1,317 Major grins
    edited October 30, 2010
    I've got some big cowboy woks I've made, but those things are huge.

    The capture of the flames is great! And yeah, what was he cooking on them?
  • Shades of HyperionShades of Hyperion Registered Users Posts: 367 Major grins
    edited November 1, 2010
    Great capture of the flames, the second one is my favorite
    Scooba Steve

    Shades of Hyperion photography
    Extraordinary photos can not be had standing where everyone else is standing, looking where everyone else is looking
  • rainbowrainbow Registered Users Posts: 2,765 Major grins
    edited November 4, 2010
    Thanks, everyone!

    He was cooking for a booth at a street fair. The tasty dish was called "Island Noodles". You can see the chicken in the first photo. In the second one, he is actually shouting, "Fire in the Hole" and putting on quite a show.

    What puzzles me are the white reflections in the first two. It is very apparent in the second, appearing as a white rectangle. No glass between the camera and flames and no filter on the lens. Thoughts, anyone?
  • RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,961 moderator
    edited November 5, 2010
    rainbow wrote: »
    What puzzles me are the white reflections in the first two. It is very apparent in the second, appearing as a white rectangle. No glass between the camera and flames and no filter on the lens. Thoughts, anyone?
    I think that's just the background seeping through. If you look at that area in #3, you can see a bright patch bounded by his torso, arm and some background clutter. Flames are not necessarily opaque and it looks as if the light on the umbrellas in the back was very bright. That's my guess, ne_nau.gif.
    My Pics
  • NyarthlopicNyarthlopic Registered Users Posts: 274 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2010
    I've always liked pictures of fire, and you captured these beautifully. Great shots!
Sign In or Register to comment.