Don Ricklin - Gear: Canon EOS 5D Mark III, was Pentax K7
'I was older then, I'm younger than that now' ....
My Blog | Q+ | Moderator, Lightroom Forums | My Amateur Smugmug Stuff | My Blurb book Rust and Whimsy. More Rust , FaceBook.
rainbow: It was a single shot and the girl was really there--I can't draw worth a damn. Just some heavy Photoshopping. This was a simplification of an even more bizarre thing I posted a couple of weeks ago in OCS.
Great example of what makes PS so potentially dangerous....
In a sense you are right. BD.
And if this had been included in Lens as one of the pj photos of the day (unless Lens was featuring altered photos, of course), then there would be a problem.
The way I look at it is that on this forum we are all adults. We know that the photo was altered. It is perhaps better described as graphic art. But it is fun to see it and think about how it was done.
Also, for many of us it is fun to play once in awhile and share our results with friends.
That said, it is always good to keep in mind the unanswerable questions about the relationship between our photos and reality and the many ways, many of which take place before we even get to the pp, we influence the story our photos tell.
Virginia
_______________________________________________ "A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
The way I look at it is that on this forum we are all adults. We know that the photo was altered. It is perhaps better described as graphic art. But it is fun to see it and think about how it was done.
Yes. Different standards apply to forensic photography, photojournalism and fine art photography. We know that some things are straight photography and others are pure graphic art, but the boundary is fuzzy, to say the least. I like to use the term "images," which sidesteps the issue.
This business of truth is pretty complicated, I think. One of Robert Capa's most famous images, The Fallen Soldier, is of dubious authenticity. It has pretty well been established that it was shot 60 kilometers away from where it was claimed, and there was no fighting going on in that area at the time. Some have claimed that it was staged altogether, but there is no proof of that. Nevertheless, it is an enormously powerful image. It's not entirely facetious to say that it's true whether it happened or not.
Cool idea but if the shadow was upsidedown and matched the direction of the real shadows in the photo it would be even creepier.
Thanks, David. I considered that, but there was a problem with the overlap of the actual feet and shadow. I don't think it would have looked as good. The biggest problem with this whole idea is getting the right shot to work with. I took over a hundred before selecting two to work on. I never realized shadows were so complex .
Thanks, David. I considered that, but there was a problem with the overlap of the actual feet and shadow. I don't think it would have looked as good. The biggest problem with this whole idea is getting the right shot to work with. I took over a hundred before selecting two to work on. I never realized shadows were so complex .
Understood. Also, I think a hint of blur might make thhe shadow look more realistic.
This business of truth is pretty complicated, I think. One of Robert Capa's most famous images, The Fallen Soldier, is of dubious authenticity. It has pretty well been established that it was shot 60 kilometers away from where it was claimed, and there was no fighting going on in that area at the time. Some have claimed that it was staged altogether, but there is no proof of that. Nevertheless, it is an enormously powerful image. It's not entirely facetious to say that it's true whether it happened or not.
Yes, I think of the Capa photograph often when this issue comes up.
Did he capture truth? I think yes.
Did he capture "the" truth - I appears that the answer is no.
Does the end justify the means? Maybe..... Sometimes .... Yes??????
Virginia
PS - Despite your photo, Richard, I still don't believe in ghosts!!
_______________________________________________ "A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Does the end justify the means? Maybe..... Sometimes .... Yes??????
For me, it comes down to how an image is presented. I am probably as adamant as BD that photojournalism must adhere to strict standards regarding image manipulation. OTOH, all's fair in art, I believe, as there are no rules. The really interesting question is whether art or journalism is the better source of truth, but I'll leave that one till I've had a second glass of wine.
Comments
Did you freehand it in or take it from another shot? Absolutely love it!
Instant story came to mind--love it.
_________
Keep it up!
Don
'I was older then, I'm younger than that now' ....
My Blog | Q+ | Moderator, Lightroom Forums | My Amateur Smugmug Stuff | My Blurb book Rust and Whimsy. More Rust , FaceBook .
Link to my Smugmug site
Only dead ones... scratchscratchscratch
rainbow: It was a single shot and the girl was really there--I can't draw worth a damn. Just some heavy Photoshopping. This was a simplification of an even more bizarre thing I posted a couple of weeks ago in OCS.
Thanks for revealing how how you did it. But I gotta wonder if you have too much spare time on your hands.
Virginia
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email
Ya think?
Nice work.
Tom
Great example of what makes PS so potentially dangerous....
"He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan
"The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
It's not the program that's dangerous but the person at the keyboard.
In a sense you are right. BD.
And if this had been included in Lens as one of the pj photos of the day (unless Lens was featuring altered photos, of course), then there would be a problem.
The way I look at it is that on this forum we are all adults. We know that the photo was altered. It is perhaps better described as graphic art. But it is fun to see it and think about how it was done.
Also, for many of us it is fun to play once in awhile and share our results with friends.
That said, it is always good to keep in mind the unanswerable questions about the relationship between our photos and reality and the many ways, many of which take place before we even get to the pp, we influence the story our photos tell.
Virginia
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email
This business of truth is pretty complicated, I think. One of Robert Capa's most famous images, The Fallen Soldier, is of dubious authenticity. It has pretty well been established that it was shot 60 kilometers away from where it was claimed, and there was no fighting going on in that area at the time. Some have claimed that it was staged altogether, but there is no proof of that. Nevertheless, it is an enormously powerful image. It's not entirely facetious to say that it's true whether it happened or not.
My Website
Facebook | Twitter | | VSCOgrid | Instagram |
Understood. Also, I think a hint of blur might make thhe shadow look more realistic.
My Website
Facebook | Twitter | | VSCOgrid | Instagram |
Yes, I think of the Capa photograph often when this issue comes up.
Did he capture truth? I think yes.
Did he capture "the" truth - I appears that the answer is no.
Does the end justify the means? Maybe..... Sometimes .... Yes??????
Virginia
PS - Despite your photo, Richard, I still don't believe in ghosts!!
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email