Dave & Danielle at Flander's Golf Resort

Moogle Pepper

Blogged. It is a big entry.

Thanks, Mike, for tagging along. I see you got some seriously sick images from this! Next time don't forget that shot. You know what I am talking about. :wink

Dave and Danielle. Hawt couple. check them out.

1

2


3


4


5


For you mike!

6

untouched in the oven.

7

Had a sitting idea, which, I think I will have to try to do better next time.

8

I am going to crop this one since, i chopped off part of Danielle to get these two.

9


10


Thanks for looking!

mmmatt

Nice set Ted!!! First one looks a scoshe greenish to me... could be me though, my color vision is not perfect. I love the comp on your sitting shot. The wide angle distortion that pulls his feet forward some is ideal for that pose IMHO. I don't care for the harshness of the light or the reflection. A tiny bit of fill, a closer main light, a little more ambient in the mix, or a brolly/softbox may have made it better. I do like the shot though and I think the idea is wonderful! I also really like 2 a lot. I think many will find it too busy but I think it rawks!

Matt

Qarik

very well done ted..I see a some patrick pike influence in 7 I think.

Moogle Pepper

Qarik wrote: »

very well done ted..I see a some patrick pike influence in 7 I think.

Actually you are half right! It was Pat's and Audrey Snow's own wedding image that got me thinking about that!

Thanks Matt, Qarik! Matt, I have an umbrella softbox thing, but left it at home...

mpaulie

Purdy photos

Moogle Pepper wrote: »

Next time don't forget that shot. You know what I am talking about.

Some people just aren't the boxer shot type

Moogle Pepper wrote: »

Thanks Matt, Qarik! Matt, I have an umbrella softbox thing, but left it at home...

I had an umbrella in the car!

tenoverthenose

Great work Ted! Lots of great shots on your blog too - I like that you are covering you bases and experimenting at the same time! Here's a few thoughts:

1 - I would focus on brides left eye because that's where the makeup artist's hand (action) is.
2 - Flawlessly executed. Maybe burn dodge and burn a bit to give it a bit more pop. Maybe b&w?
3 - I would brighten her face up a bit. Great negative space.
5 - Lots of possibilities here ... how are you going to use that reflection next time?
7 - I love the dramatic lighting, but the frame has a lot going on in it. I'm interested to see where this goes for you...

mpaulie

tenoverthenose wrote: »

5 - Lots of possibilities here ... how are you going to use that reflection next time?

Just realized you can see me chimping in the lens of his left eye, Ted was about 3 inches from that dude's face.

Moogle Pepper

mpaulie wrote: »

Just realized you can see me chimping in the lens of his left eye, Ted was about 3 inches from that dude's face.

Didn't you read the caption? haha! Actually I was about 2 ft away. haw haw!

As for #7, I actually, wanted to play more with this. But with kids in the bridal suite and other misc. adults around it might have been ... Well Mike could have shoo'd them away...

I should have also tossed that plant across the room. roflIt's a fake plant, I could shot put it! Well ideas for the next.

canonthen

Great captures.

I think I was driving that same day you were shooting the couple on the golf course. I remember seeing two or three photogs and thinking how the photos would come out with just the boring open fields on the golf course.. You did really good!

Moogle Pepper

canonthen wrote: »

Great captures.

I think I was driving that same day you were shooting the couple on the golf course. I remember seeing two or three photogs and thinking how the photos would come out with just the boring open fields on the golf course.. You did really good!

Asian guy and a seriously tall guy?

canonthen

Moogle Pepper wrote: »

Asian guy and a seriously tall guy?

Sorry Ted, I noticed the action on the field almost too late. The people buzz in front of the catering place caught my eye first, then I saw the bride, groom and photogs in the field across the road (almost missed it). Everyone but the couple had their backs to me, one photog had a zoom lens (black I think).

Moogle Pepper

canonthen wrote: »

Sorry Ted, I noticed the action on the field almost too late. The people buzz in front of the catering place caught my eye first, then I saw the bride, groom and photogs in the field across the road (almost missed it). Everyone but the couple had their backs to me, one photog had a zoom lens (black I think).

You should have stopped to say hi. Regardless if it was us or not! Although, Mike (the really tall one) and I were shooting with just primes.

canonthen

Moogle Pepper wrote: »

You should have stopped to say hi. Regardless if it was us or not! Although, Mike (the really tall one) and I were shooting with just primes.

Cool man, next time.

and again, nice work.

Moogle Pepper

Thanks!

I don't usually add more images to a thread afterwards, but...

I love this sequence:

nicoleshilliday

#2 is my fav! love it.

it might be just me, but these all seem a little dark to me. not just in the color but the mood in general. not your usual? maybe its me being sleepy. i liked the others you had on FB better from this wedding

AroundDWorld

Nice.....I'm loving the image through the window....#2

Moogle Pepper

nicoleshilliday wrote: »

#2 is my fav! love it.

it might be just me, but these all seem a little dark to me. not just in the color but the mood in general. not your usual? maybe its me being sleepy. i liked the others you had on FB better from this wedding

the ones I posted here or on the blog?

trevorb

Really like the composition in #3 and number #2 is really unique definitely a favorite.

Moogle Pepper

Thanks, Trev!