Karra and Jared - not a Yosemite wedding
tenoverthenose
Registered Users Posts: 815 Major grins
An incredibly beautiful wedding in the high sierra, that was unfortunately a bit of a logistical nightmare. Everyone was getting ready in separate locations with no phone communication. It was pouring down rain for most of the day, and a snap on the back of the brides dress broke (yikes) moments before the ceremony. Nevertheless, it was wonderful for the couple. Great celebration of love, and an amazing time was had by all. More (and the full story) on my website.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
0
Comments
www.tednghiem.com
Question on 5. Have you got external lights going off from somewhere???
Matt
Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
Sorry Ted, still not safe for public consumption on that one Still damn funny though...
Heather there was a flash going off from someone's point and shoot from the left. I wish I could say that I had the foresight to set up a light, but it wasn't mine. Just a very lucky grab.
Matt - HA! first of all, my exposures are always all over the place. I'm not too concerned on getting things 100% dead on in camera all the time. In #2 I'm sure the exposure was pretty close to what I ended up with here, I slowed the shutter a bit to add a sense of movement to it. I have added grain to the whole set - I like the way it looks and it seems to fit the couple's style. #4 is tilted for sure - it was a LUCKY grab. I was running up to their place to warn them that they were about to be chewed out by the wedding planner (long story) and they, enjoying a few beers, greeted me like this - I shot from the hip. #6 isn't tilted so much as it is distorted - shot with my 16-35, probably pretty close to 16mm.
#7 was the one and only portrait I took of the couple that day. It was about 45 minutes after sunset when I had to do family portraits, this was one frame I grabbed of the couple. It rained heavily, the brides dress broke, and there were a few scheduling snafus, so I volunteered to come back and shoot the portraits the next day. The entire bridal party got dressed back up
Love to see more exterior shots if you have them. The location looks pretty nice. Tom's?
Matt
Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
Thanks Suzanne! The other side of the coin, is that most of this was shot at 3200iso and up (I think I capped out at 6400iso), so there is a bit of noise in it. In post, I tend to reduce the noise a bit, but also add grain back in for a bit of texture. It just looks a lot more organic to me. Personal preference.
No worries Matt - trust me I take LOTS and LOTS of crappy pictures. I love to experiment and play around on shoots. Some work, and some don't. Those are just the ones that get deleted quickly
I just checked out the website for that place. Looks like an awesome location. Looks like a great vacation spot too.
I don't need to see the flask