Quick Easy Bulk Download Photos (Zip, hopefully)

jc20jc20 Registered Users Posts: 3 Beginner grinner
edited September 20, 2005 in SmugMug Support
Is there some option or easy, quick tool to download a whole gallery? One of my relatives prefers to use their own printer. I have tried Star Explorer, Smugmug Download tool, WebDAV, etc. All are slow or otherwise clunky and non-user friendly. Gallery 2.0, LinPHA, and a few other Linux server tools already have this option. I'm sure other services (I believe ClubPhoto) have the option to download a zip file of a whole gallery as well. Does Smugmug have this? If not, that stinks!

Comments

  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 10, 2005
    jc20 wrote:
    Is there some option or easy, quick tool to download a whole gallery? One of my relatives prefers to use their own printer. I have tried Star Explorer, Smugmug Download tool, WebDAV, etc. All are slow or otherwise clunky and non-user friendly. Gallery 2.0, LinPHA, and a few other Linux server tools already have this option. I'm sure other services (I believe ClubPhoto) have the option to download a zip file of a whole gallery as well. Does Smugmug have this? If not, that stinks!


    wave.gif hiya jc - so you've tried smugmug windowload tool?...

    and the rest of the hacks and apps?

    there's another option, your relatives may order a cd or dvd backup of a gallery, quick and easy. wish i had a better answer for you.
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited September 10, 2005
    Try WebDav.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • jfriendjfriend Registered Users Posts: 8,097 Major grins
    edited September 10, 2005
    Warning about webdav
    DavidTO wrote:
    Try WebDav.
    I tried to use WebDav for downloading multiple galleries and found it had some serious problems, corrupting every sixth image download. The problem was 100% reproducible in my circumstance. I reported it to help@smugmug.com, got a response that they'd look into it, but never heard anything after that.

    So, I'd be wary of their webdav implementation which they've never taken out of "beta" status. It did not work for me.

    --John
    --John
    HomepagePopular
    JFriend's javascript customizationsSecrets for getting fast answers on Dgrin
    Always include a link to your site when posting a question
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited September 10, 2005
    jfriend wrote:
    I tried to use WebDav for downloading multiple galleries and found it had some serious problems, corrupting every sixth image download. The problem was 100% reproducible in my circumstance. I reported it to help@smugmug.com, got a response that they'd look into it, but never heard anything after that.

    So, I'd be wary of their webdav implementation which they've never taken out of "beta" status. It did not work for me.

    --John

    Huh. Haven't had the problem, but also didn't use it all that much. Curious that it would corrupt files, it doesn't seem possible to my limited knowledge that WebDav would corrupt them...but I don't know much about that stuff.

    Anyone else played with it with success or problems?
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 10, 2005
    jfriend wrote:
    I tried to use WebDav for downloading multiple galleries and found it had some serious problems, corrupting every sixth image download. The problem was 100% reproducible in my circumstance. I reported it to help@smugmug.com, got a response that they'd look into it, but never heard anything after that.

    So, I'd be wary of their webdav implementation which they've never taken out of "beta" status. It did not work for me.

    --John
    smugmug wrote:
    WARNING: smugDAV is highly experimental. I wouldn't even call it BETA level software just yet. If you're not comfortable fiddling with your computer, and potentially breaking something, please don't try this!

    as reported on the webdav page on smugmug help
  • luke_churchluke_church Registered Users Posts: 507 Major grins
    edited September 10, 2005
    DavidTO wrote:
    Anyone else played with it with success or problems?
    Worked fine for me.

    Downsides:

    - Bit on the slow side, don't even think of it for Dialup, but that's kind of inevitable
    - Needed high stability in the connection to work very well. Flaky connections would fail with only some of the file copied, but I didn't see any obvious data corruption.

    Luke
  • asdasd Registered Users Posts: 115 Major grins
    edited September 10, 2005
    Worked fine for me.

    Downsides:

    - Bit on the slow side, don't even think of it for Dialup, but that's kind of inevitable
    - Needed high stability in the connection to work very well. Flaky connections would fail with only some of the file copied, but I didn't see any obvious data corruption.

    Luke

    I've used smugdav to pull down several large albums and have had no problems at all. I was initially surprised to find all images ever uploaded to an album present (even after deleting them), but haven't had any problems with it.

    My only gripe is with Windows XP - it doesn't make it easy to remove the webdav entries - if you delete the shortcut it will still list the connection in the dropdown box when you go to create a new one (and your credentials will be cached). Deleting a registry key fixes that though. :D
  • jc20jc20 Registered Users Posts: 3 Beginner grinner
    edited September 20, 2005
    Bulk Download
    I've tried everything I can think of, including a trial of some commercial software (forget the name). I'll submit this as a feature request. I may switch back to Gallery 2.0 for the meantime. Thanks for your responses!
    andy wrote:
    wave.gif hiya jc - so you've tried smugmug windowload tool?...

    and the rest of the hacks and apps?

    there's another option, your relatives may order a cd or dvd backup of a gallery, quick and easy. wish i had a better answer for you.
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited September 20, 2005
    jc20 wrote:
    I've tried everything I can think of, including a trial of some commercial software (forget the name). I'll submit this as a feature request. I may switch back to Gallery 2.0 for the meantime. Thanks for your responses!


    Have you tried this?
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Sign In or Register to comment.