Dpi
rashbrook
Registered Users Posts: 92 Big grins
Quote from: http://www.smugmug.com/help/print-quality
"Wondering about dpi? Don't. It won't matter at all for display on SmugMug or printing."
I was looking through my uploaded photos today, and to my surprise, some of the photos I've posted on my site were uploaded @ 72dpi. I've not printed my photos in volume in the past, but, before someone orders one of these photos as a print, I want to be sure that it will print correctly. I've read that 300dpi is the standard for professional photos, in the past.
But.. then I read the info on the page I've linked above, and found the quote I pasted in. Really? Can I leave my photos 'as is' on my site (the 72dpi shots) and not worry about it?
Thanks -
Robert
"Wondering about dpi? Don't. It won't matter at all for display on SmugMug or printing."
I was looking through my uploaded photos today, and to my surprise, some of the photos I've posted on my site were uploaded @ 72dpi. I've not printed my photos in volume in the past, but, before someone orders one of these photos as a print, I want to be sure that it will print correctly. I've read that 300dpi is the standard for professional photos, in the past.
But.. then I read the info on the page I've linked above, and found the quote I pasted in. Really? Can I leave my photos 'as is' on my site (the 72dpi shots) and not worry about it?
Thanks -
Robert
0
Comments
If you have a 2400x3000-pixel file and it says 72dpi, it means it would be 72dpi at 33.3 inches by 41.6 inches. If you don't throw away any pixels, naturally the density (resolution) will increase as you reduce the size, or decrease as you increase the size.
The way to do it wrong is to upload an image that would be 576 pixels by 720 pixels. That would equal 72 dpi at 8x10 inches.
Given that most cameras are 10 megapixels or higher now (for example, 3700x2800 pixels), you can't go wrong if you simply upload the whole thing. When reduced to 8x10, today's cameras produce a density much higher than 300dpi, unless you cropped or downsampled so severely that you have too few pixels left.
I do however have a few @ 2896x1936, and a few @ 2048x1536.
Am I reasonably safe with the 2896x1936?
Would I be better off setting the 2048x1536 to be "no print"?
Thanks again for your advice.
-Robert
Ashbrook Photography | Facebook | Twitter
probably. I've gotten stellar results even at 150dpi. But I'll move this thread to smug support for more answers.
Moderator of: Location, Location, Location , Mind Your Own Business & Other Cool Shots
Yes.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
With the 2048x1536 photos - how can I set them to be 'no print' if they exist in a gallery under either portfolio or gallery pricing?
-Robert
Edit: Actually, I was just reading here again: http://www.smugmug.com/help/print-quality
According to the chart, and the recommended settings section, it seems like 2048x1536 shouldn't be a problem for most prints either.
Can someone confirm that - so I'm sure that I'm understanding correctly?
Ashbrook Photography | Facebook | Twitter
Those are our MINIMUMS. More (and up to all the original pixels) will always be better.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Edgar Gonzalez
www.mcallenphoto.com
Homepage • Popular
JFriend's javascript customizations • Secrets for getting fast answers on Dgrin
Always include a link to your site when posting a question