3 Bridges

ruttrutt Registered Users Posts: 6,511 Major grins
edited September 12, 2005 in Landscapes
Under the Rt 2 bridge over the Charles, in Boston.

35653186-L.jpg
If not now, when?

Comments

  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 11, 2005
    love the composition, nice confluence of elements. you know i dig the wide angle!

    there's evidence of exposure adjustment around the main bridge though - you, the photoshop master, i know you can do better deal.gif
  • mereimagemereimage Registered Users Posts: 448 Major grins
    edited September 12, 2005
    andy wrote:
    love the composition, nice confluence of elements. you know i dig the wide angle!

    there's evidence of exposure adjustment around the main bridge though - you, the photoshop master, i know you can do better deal.gif
    and along the top of the middle bridge....perhaps too large a featherheadscratch.gifheadscratch.gif

    But I really like the pictureclap.gifclap.gifclap.gif.............Mereimage
  • ruttrutt Registered Users Posts: 6,511 Major grins
    edited September 12, 2005
    andy wrote:
    love the composition, nice confluence of elements. you know i dig the wide angle!

    there's evidence of exposure adjustment around the main bridge though - you, the photoshop master, i know you can do better deal.gif

    Thanks for the critique, Andy. I didn't see the artifacts around the bridge, but I do now. I tried again. Does it look better? There is sort of a fine line between catching the clouds in the upper left and letting the retouching show around the bridge. (At least with my current workflow.)

    35730798-L.jpg
    If not now, when?
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 12, 2005
    rutt wrote:
    Thanks for the critique, Andy. I didn't see the artifacts around the bridge, but I do now. I tried again. Does it look better? There is sort of a fine line between catching the clouds in the upper left and letting the retouching show around the bridge. (At least with my current workflow.)

    35730798-S.jpg

    *much* better and fwiw, they weren't artifacts - they were evidence of exposure adjustments ... there's a big difference imo. the second version is much better.
  • Yuri PautovYuri Pautov Registered Users Posts: 1,918 Major grins
    edited September 12, 2005
    rutt wrote:
    Under the Rt 2 bridge over the Charles, in Boston.

    35653186-L.jpg
    Interesting composition. I'd add a bit of 'more movement' to the man (it can be done in PP)
    Did you get my answeres to your questions 'bout portraits?
    Spasibo, Yuri
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited September 12, 2005
    Interesting composition. I'd add a bit of 'more movement' to the man (it can be done in PP)
    Did you get my answeres to your questions 'bout portraits?
    Spasibo, Yuri


    awesome idea, yuri. yes - rutt - a bit of motion blur applied on an adjustment layer, then masked away, and paint back over the runner. tasty.
  • ruttrutt Registered Users Posts: 6,511 Major grins
    edited September 12, 2005
    Interesting composition. I'd add a bit of 'more movement' to the man (it can be done in PP)
    Did you get my answeres to your questions 'bout portraits?
    Spasibo, Yuri

    Thanks for your answers about the portraits. Thought I PM'ed you or something, but perhaps I had a senior moment. Good suggestion about this image. Thanks.
    If not now, when?
  • ruttrutt Registered Users Posts: 6,511 Major grins
    edited September 12, 2005
    I tried out Yuri's suggestion. It's not really the kind of PP I'm comfortable with and perhaps I wasn't brave enough or to brave or something. It's pretty subtle. There already was some real motion blur, especially his right foot. I reasoned that his left foot should have almost none since it's on the ground....

    What do you guys think?

    35746903-L.jpg
    If not now, when?
  • Yuri PautovYuri Pautov Registered Users Posts: 1,918 Major grins
    edited September 12, 2005
    rutt wrote:
    I tried out Yuri's suggestion. It's not really the kind of PP I'm comfortable with and perhaps I wasn't brave enough or to brave or something. It's pretty subtle. There already was some real motion blur, especially his right foot. I reasoned that his left foot should have almost none since it's on the ground....

    What do you guys think?

    35746903-L.jpg
    Now I like it - this 'thing' (shirt) in his hand, his left leg - all are moving now!
    Great!
    Spasibo, Yuri
Sign In or Register to comment.