Options

some varied images - NSFW

PhoebusPhoebus Registered Users Posts: 7 Beginner grinner
edited December 19, 2010 in Go Figure
Thought I would post a few for comment.

SessionImage01.jpg?key=jvSKOKzlnJF1

SessionImage14.jpg?key=jvSKOKzlnJF1

I hope this last one is ok for standards, if not I can remove it.

SessionImage20.jpg?key=jvSKOKzlnJF1


Phoebus

Comments

  • Options
    TenThirteenTenThirteen Registered Users Posts: 488 Major grins
    edited December 16, 2010
    I find #2 very appealing, its a lovely stufy of a womans shape. Was the grain/noise in the photo on purpose?

    To be honest, #1 and #3 make me uncomfortable. I can't really think of any input so I will leave those alone. :-)
    Canon Fan
  • Options
    PhoebusPhoebus Registered Users Posts: 7 Beginner grinner
    edited December 17, 2010
    Grain/noise was done with malice of forethought ;)

    as to the other two these poses/images were by request of the model(s).


    Phoebus
  • Options
    NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited December 17, 2010
    I like the upper body on #1 (both body- and pose-wise) thumb.gif, but the legs position, skin defects on model's thighs and goose bumps on model's left breast is killing it for me as a whole.ne_nau.gif
    #2 and #3 don't do much for me, sorry! :cry
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • Options
    BlurmoreBlurmore Registered Users Posts: 992 Major grins
    edited December 18, 2010
    I like the concept of three...but the shot needs to be perfectly straight on. Having the perspective off kills it...I also think that dual side lights could make this a very dramatic abstract nude. #1 doesn't really do anything for me, the light is not very flattering.
  • Options
    PhoebusPhoebus Registered Users Posts: 7 Beginner grinner
    edited December 19, 2010
    Thank you for the feed back it's quite helpful in sorting this out. Still pretty new at this kind of work. But willing to listen and to learn.

    Phoebus
Sign In or Register to comment.