Girl With Pearl Earring
OK, I'm not Vermeer, and this isn't a girl, and there's no pearl earring, but when I first saw the image, that's what I thought of. This is my six-year-old gransdon :lust who was kind enough to model for me while I fiddled around with a two light portrait setup. Other than some PS work to get rid of a big ol' grapejuice moustache (I left the chapped lips) it hasn't had any massaging. Is it too dark, or does it work like this? Thanks for your time.
John :
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
0
Comments
I had to edit my post. My bad Icebear, I did not read your post that well that I really mistaken him as a "her". Kindly accept my apologies.
http://imagesbyjirobau.blogspot.com/
no it is not too dark, it does work for me.........but a 3rd light for the bg would be nice to produce some separation or taking the 2nd light to behind the grandsons head and shooting into the head to place a halo around him.......just ideas for separation from bg.......
My models (my Kids) all learned to be invisible when I dragged out the lights and camera (talking 30+ yrs ago when I was teaching myself to shoot)....so I found a wig head at a Goodwill store...it had a hole in the bottom of the neck...that is where I shove a light stand...no more complaining models (kids) when I want to try something new or just play around....it is bright white tho and that does play havoc sometimes.......has detoured a few vehicle break ins also when it sits in car on a really short bg light stand......
http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
It is about how that thing looks photographed." Garry Winogrand
Avatar credit: photograph by Duane Michals- picture of me, 'Smash Palace' album
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
John, keep the grapejuice, you can blackmail her later in life. Gotta love little girls.
www.cameraone.biz
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
With respect, I find this an odd and even dangerous remark! That a boy could be too beautiful?!
Reminds me that beauty was also a "problem" for the ancient Greeks, but of quite a different kind. Physical perfection of any kind, for them, was something of a liability, since it belonged in the realm of the Divine and was likely to be reclaimed into that realm sooner than later, as was the case with Ganymedes (etymology = 'pride in boyhood').
Beauty, responsibility and logic are things that can never be disclaimed by "too".
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
www.SaraPiazza.com - Edgartown News - Trad Diary - Facebook
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
P.S. My grandson got mistaken to for a girl all the time as he had hair down to his waist until recently when he donated a good portion of it to Lochs of Love