need input for a Nikon lens

amadeus

I want to buy an FX lens for my D700. the 70 - 200 F 2.8 @ approx $2100 seems to be the sports/action lens of choice but they also make a lens that is 80 - 200 that is not VR for about $1100.

the guy at B&H said the 2 lens are both the same type of heavy duty construction the only difference is one is not VR. but for the next few months I'll be shooting indoors and want a "fast" lens but not so long and I want it to be the same heavy duty construction as the 2 lens listed above for when i do venture back outdoors to the motocross tracks I primarily shoot.

is there any designation of Nikon len's that will get me the heavy type construction I want? any lens suggestions appreciated.

Mitchell

I don't know of a specific "designation" but in general, the F2.8 zooms are pro grade lenses with great construction. I own the 70-200mmVR. You won't be disappointed with the sharpness and construction of this lens. I rarely use the VR. It's a waste for sports and will not be helpful in your motocross photos. I suspect you would be very happy with the 80-200mm for your action shots if you don't need the VR for other applications.

Art Scott

going out on the proverbial limb here.....you might want to look at Sigma's 2.8 70-200....their vr (OS) is quite qabit less expensive than the Nikon...I have no experience with the VR version but do own and use the older (much older) 70-210 f2.8......I shoot wildlife and wedding and portraits with it.....I have not had any reason to squawk about Sigma for the last 25+ yrs of using them.

It can save you some money in the long run and they are much lighter than the Nikon's..............

FLYING EYEBALL

The 80-200 AF-D is an awesome piece of glass for the money.


ken rockwell has a pretty good write up on the different models from over the years.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/80-200mm-history.htm

ARKreations

FLYING EYEBALL wrote: »

The 80-200 AF-D is an awesome piece of glass for the money.

However, if you're going to be shooting any kind of action indoors with low light, the faster auto focus of the 70-200 is worth the difference in cost. But a tripod can also help bridge the gap.