Los Angeles Permit Question (non commercial use)
Alex.90
Registered Users Posts: 2 Beginner grinner
Hey everyone,
I was wondering if anyone could help me out with some questions I have concerning photography permits or shooting legally in Los Angeles.
I'm a beginning amateur photographer that just enjoys taking photos. My gear is a point and shoot Canon SX210 is, tripod( brand name unavailable), and a Targus flexible tripod. I was at Los Angeles Pershing Square this past weekend doing some night photography when I was asked by a police officer to take down my tripod for I couldn't use it, and it could lead me up to an arrest. So without knowing any laws or rights at the moment I accepted and moved along. I was not disturbing or blocking the public's access, safety or calling attention. I tried to choose an angle, and quickly set up my tripod at a good place and take the shot. When I got home I tried to do some research and found out that photographers have rights and that there are permits needed for doing commercial photography. My question is if I'm not a professional photographer nor I do or use my photography for commecial use, do I still need a permit to photograph in Los Angeles with my tripod?
Also, I would appreciate if anyone could give me any advice if night photography is acceptable in places such as the Walt Disney Concert Hall, freeway bridges, Griffith Observatory, Hollywood, beaches, or any touristic sites were night photography could be shot?
Any advice, help, or response would be great! Thanks!
Photography experience: Beginner
Photo purposes: Personal,hobby, non-commercial
I was wondering if anyone could help me out with some questions I have concerning photography permits or shooting legally in Los Angeles.
I'm a beginning amateur photographer that just enjoys taking photos. My gear is a point and shoot Canon SX210 is, tripod( brand name unavailable), and a Targus flexible tripod. I was at Los Angeles Pershing Square this past weekend doing some night photography when I was asked by a police officer to take down my tripod for I couldn't use it, and it could lead me up to an arrest. So without knowing any laws or rights at the moment I accepted and moved along. I was not disturbing or blocking the public's access, safety or calling attention. I tried to choose an angle, and quickly set up my tripod at a good place and take the shot. When I got home I tried to do some research and found out that photographers have rights and that there are permits needed for doing commercial photography. My question is if I'm not a professional photographer nor I do or use my photography for commecial use, do I still need a permit to photograph in Los Angeles with my tripod?
Also, I would appreciate if anyone could give me any advice if night photography is acceptable in places such as the Walt Disney Concert Hall, freeway bridges, Griffith Observatory, Hollywood, beaches, or any touristic sites were night photography could be shot?
Any advice, help, or response would be great! Thanks!
Photography experience: Beginner
Photo purposes: Personal,hobby, non-commercial
0
Comments
I'll try to find info and post in a follow up.
.
Moderator of: Location, Location, Location , Mind Your Own Business & Other Cool Shots
http://www.largeformatphotography.info/photo-permits/PermitRegulations.htm#LosAngeles
.
Moderator of: Location, Location, Location , Mind Your Own Business & Other Cool Shots
Source: http://www.metro.net/board/Items/2010/07_July/20100722RBMItem15.pdf
Smugger for life!
Most Popular Photos
I was in Pershing Square a few weeks ago and I can tell you that the police there (they're actually private security guards) were pretty nasty. I was taking a lighting class and they didn't even want us to stand there. We actually left. And we were tripod free. We did have light on a stick.
Flash Frozen Photography, Inc.
http://flashfrozenphotography.com
Had something like that in Milwaukee once at the Art Museum ( I think) on the lake front. Security asked me what I was taking pictures for, personal or commercial, was a model shoot and personal.. So he left. He gave some explanation that the building was "copywriten"