What is "street photography"

2»

Comments

  • RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,961 moderator
    edited January 21, 2011
    rdalland wrote: »
    Does this shot meet the criteria for "Street Photography"?
    Sure, why not?
  • rdallandrdalland Registered Users Posts: 150 Major grins
    edited January 21, 2011
    Richard wrote: »
    Sure, why not?

    Telephoto lens, no engagement. Guess I'm just looking for some clarity...
  • lizzard_nyclizzard_nyc Registered Users Posts: 4,056 Major grins
    edited January 21, 2011
    rdalland wrote: »
    Telephoto lens, no engagement. Guess I'm just looking for some clarity...


    clear as mud.
    I do like Damon's statement though--and that's what I will continue to strive for (the end result)--with my non tele, because that works for me.
    Liz A.
    _________
  • sara505sara505 Registered Users Posts: 1,684 Major grins
    edited January 21, 2011
    damonff wrote: »
    It doesn't matter at all whether you use a wide, a normal, or a super tele or whether or not you engage or whether you use a digital sensor or film. The only thing that matters is the photograph.
    I hate to be a trouble-maker - oh, okay, I actually enjoy it - but this statement, while a very good summary, is only almost true. What would be more true is if the last sentence were emended to "The most important thing is the photograph." If the only thing that mattered was the photograph, then ethical standards would have to be tossed out the window, for example, getting a shot at all costs, even at the cost of a life or a person's dignity.
  • RichardRichard Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,961 moderator
    edited January 21, 2011
    sara505 wrote: »
    I hate to be a trouble-maker - oh, okay, I actually enjoy it - but this statement, while a very good summary, is only almost true. What would be more true is if the last sentence were emended to "The most important thing is the photograph." If the only thing that mattered was the photograph, then ethical standards would have to be tossed out the window, for example, getting a shot at all costs, even at the cost of a life or a person's dignity.

    OK Sara, but with respect, ethical standards apply to photographers, not photographs. We have no idea what was involved in the making of the vast majority of the pics we see, yet we evaluate them regardless.
  • sara505sara505 Registered Users Posts: 1,684 Major grins
    edited January 21, 2011
    Richard wrote: »
    OK Sara, but with respect, ethical standards apply to photographers, not photographs. We have no idea what was involved in the making of the vast majority of the pics we see, yet we evaluate them regardless.

    I agree.
  • jdryan3jdryan3 Registered Users Posts: 1,353 Major grins
    edited January 22, 2011
    sara505 wrote: »
    If the only thing that mattered was the photograph, then ethical standards would have to be tossed out the window, for example, getting a shot at all costs, even at the cost of a life or a person's dignity.
    :poke since I couldn't find the gasoline on fire emoticon.
    Sara's statement of "ethical standards" brings in the dividing line between PJ with an actual code of professional ethics, and B.D.'s beginning statement on "street" photography and the ancillary back and forth.

    I interjected on a similar thread when this forum first opened several years ago so I'll just sit back and :lurk while everyone :duel
    "Don't ask me what I think of you, I might not give the answer that you want me to. Oh well."
    -Fleetwood Mac
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited February 3, 2011
  • bdcolenbdcolen Registered Users Posts: 3,804 Major grins
    edited February 3, 2011
    Or, just an overdose of GREATS. Thanks, Angelo!
    bd@bdcolenphoto.com
    "He not busy being born is busy dying." Bob Dylan

    "The more ambiguous the photograph is, the better it is..." Leonard Freed
Sign In or Register to comment.