I'm no physicist, but I would think the optics would be all wrong, as the sensor is much larger on MF. Sort of like why you can't use Canon EF-S lenses on full frame cameras. I would think vignetting would be extreme.
Don't forget the flange to film distance isn't even close. Nikon F mount lenses have one of the largest 35mm format distances at 46.5mm. The absolute smallest medium format flange to film distance I can think of is Mamiya 645, which is in the low 60s. Hasselblad and other square formats are high 70s/low 80s.
Which camera are you referring to? It appeared that the cameras on that site all had a Pentacon Six mount, which is a medium format mount. All the adapters I saw were to put pentacon six lenses on 35mm cameras, which is kind of the opposite direction of what you're looking to do.
If course, I looked at this site on my phone, so I might have missed something.
Which camera are you referring to? It appeared that the cameras on that site all had a Pentacon Six mount, which is a medium format mount. All the adapters I saw were to put pentacon six lenses on 35mm cameras, which is kind of the opposite direction of what you're looking to do.
If course, I looked at this site on my phone, so I might have missed something.
Comments
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
If course, I looked at this site on my phone, so I might have missed something.
This one: http://www.hartblei.eu/en/hartbleicam2.htm
It is SICK! :)
May I ask why you would like to use 35mm lenses on a medium format camera?
My Hasselblad XPan lenses might pretty well cover the sensor and they come with center weighted filters to correct vignetting.
Dale B. Dalrymple
http://dbdimages.com
...with apology to Archimedies