You took what could have been a mundane capture and made it into a very striking and interesting image.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Thanks to all for looking and commenting - especially as it's in a way that makes me think that the time I spend grovelling around in mud / water isn't completely wasted
<< can't say that I have seen one like that before >>
This surprises me a little, as there are many splendid examples around of low pov shots - I'm only trying to do what pros suggest / advise - get down to the subject's eye level. Not always easy (esp. when water's involved) , but as I like the results too, I persevere.
Thanks ... and very little, iirc, as I was on dry(ish) land, but the cam / lens was on a beanbag atop a home-made turntable situated in the water. In calm conditions there's rarely more than 25mm of daylight between the hood underside and water surface.
I do know about 'getting wet' tho ... if not on this occasion
Paul, you are THE BEST at getting these low angles. I also love the soft BG, the lighting from the right, yet the lighter part of the BG on the left, that calm, calm water, and, of course, the bird! Best, Pam
Robert, Dennis, Jeffro - thanks for looking and commenting. When the light's right at the location this was taken, I've got 2 into sun and 2 away from sun options for shooting direction.
Btw, Dennis - as we've spoken before about low level rigs (around water), I've recently started using a new arrangement over the last couple of weeks or so - one originally built for use on a concrete boat ramp. (it was used for my DSS121 challenge entry, as I happened to be using the centre AF point at the time)
Comments
My Website index | My Blog
You took what could have been a mundane capture and made it into a very striking and interesting image.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
"Osprey Whisperer"
OspreyWhisperer.com
pp
Flickr
<< can't say that I have seen one like that before >>
This surprises me a little, as there are many splendid examples around of low pov shots - I'm only trying to do what pros suggest / advise - get down to the subject's eye level. Not always easy (esp. when water's involved) , but as I like the results too, I persevere.
pp
Flickr
Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen
+1 to that
Thomas Fuller.
SmugMug account.
Website.
pp
Flickr
Thanks ... and very little, iirc, as I was on dry(ish) land, but the cam / lens was on a beanbag atop a home-made turntable situated in the water. In calm conditions there's rarely more than 25mm of daylight between the hood underside and water surface.
I do know about 'getting wet' tho ... if not on this occasion
pp
Flickr
Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
Pam, I think the answer's probably associated with not being allowed to play in the mud as a kid ... and grovelling in same now is making up for it
pp
Flickr
pp
Flickr
Dennis Kaczor Photography
http://rckimaging.smugmug.com/
Btw, Dennis - as we've spoken before about low level rigs (around water), I've recently started using a new arrangement over the last couple of weeks or so - one originally built for use on a concrete boat ramp. (it was used for my DSS121 challenge entry, as I happened to be using the centre AF point at the time)
pp
Flickr
http://www.facebook.com/pages/S-Hunter-Spenceley/163167257159062