Water shots
garrick
Registered Users Posts: 3 Beginner grinner
Hello everyone,
First post here. I was looking through some of the recent contributions to this forum and was just blown away. I'm looking forward to learning how to get more out of my shots and processing from your comments.
Here are two shots I took last fall on Lake Superior's north shore. I really like these in B&W but am looking for suggestions on how to improve them, both from technical and compositional standpoints.
#1: Cross River near Schroeder, MN. Taken from a vehicle bridge.
#2: Rocks of Lake Superior. Taken at a small harbor in Tofte, MN. You can see the breakwater (made of boulders) in the background.
Thanks for your comments!
First post here. I was looking through some of the recent contributions to this forum and was just blown away. I'm looking forward to learning how to get more out of my shots and processing from your comments.
Here are two shots I took last fall on Lake Superior's north shore. I really like these in B&W but am looking for suggestions on how to improve them, both from technical and compositional standpoints.
#1: Cross River near Schroeder, MN. Taken from a vehicle bridge.
#2: Rocks of Lake Superior. Taken at a small harbor in Tofte, MN. You can see the breakwater (made of boulders) in the background.
Thanks for your comments!
0
Comments
I really dig the second. The rock in the front just makes it
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
I think its just a personal thing, but I've found that I'm not a huge fan of images that have lots of motion in one part, but then just still in the other. I love the rock at the bottom half of the frame, but the top half is so still.
Anyway, some wonderful shots no matter how you look at them.
Lenses: Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 VR II | Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 | Nikon 50mm f/1.4
Lighting: SB-910 | SU-800
Interesting take on the motion in one part but not in the other -- I've never considered that.