Lookin for a Lense for my Nikon d90, which one?

Butterfly2011Butterfly2011 Registered Users Posts: 269 Major grins
edited March 4, 2011 in Accessories
I am buying a Nikon D90 camera. Which will be used for Portraits inside and outside, nature, weddings, children. I was looking at the Nikon 18-105mm lense or would a 18-200mm be better? Please tell me ur thoughts on what lense or lenses. Is a Sigma lense better than Nikon Lense?
Thank u!

Comments

  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited February 22, 2011
    I am buying a Nikon D90 camera. Which will be used for Portraits inside and outside, nature, weddings, children. I was looking at the Nikon 18-105mm lense or would a 18-200mm be better? Please tell me ur thoughts on what lense or lenses. Is a Sigma lense better than Nikon Lense?
    Thank u!

    For weddings your main goal is image quality and while the super-zoom lenses are convenient (the afore mentioned 18-200mm and 18-105mm) they are not the best image quality.

    I highly recommend a 2 lens system to start. For instance:
    Nikkor 17-55mm, f2.8G ED-IF AF-S DX and a

    Nikkor 70-200mm, f2.8G ED VR II AF-S

    ... would be an excellent 2 lens kit for the D90 and is capable of professional results.

    On a budget you might consider:
    Tamron SP 17-50mm, f2.8 XR Di-II LD SP ZL Aspherical (IF) and a

    Tamron 70-200mm, f2.8 Di LD IF Macro or, considering that you may have fast-moving children, the

    Sigma 70-200mm, f2.8 DG HSM II Macro

    The Sigma 70-200mm has a faster AF, although the Tamron 70-200mm is a little better image quality. The Nikkor 70-200mm has both speed and quality, but you pay a premium for it.

    These 2 lens kits will do nicely along with an appropriate flash and flash modifier.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • MomaZunkMomaZunk Registered Users Posts: 421 Major grins
    edited February 22, 2011
    The 18-200mm is my favorite lens that I keep on my camera for family and kid events. You need good light to get decent results. For indoors, I use an ON camera bounce flash. Probably not the best set up for weddings. You will need to correct barrel distortion and will see some vignetting down at the 18-20 mm. With other faster lens, I get better better quality, but I really miss the range of this lens when I don't have it on my camera.

    I see the 18-200mm as more of a starter lens, so I would second the 2 lens system above. The Nikon 70-200mm 2.8 showed up on my porch yesterday. :-) My next upgrade for lens will be at the wide end with the Tokina 11-16mm DX.
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited February 22, 2011
    MomaZunk wrote: »
    ... The Nikon 70-200mm 2.8 showed up on my porch yesterday. :-) ...

    Congratulations on the new lens. clap.gif
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • MomaZunkMomaZunk Registered Users Posts: 421 Major grins
    edited February 22, 2011
    Thanks...just in tome for the first night baseball game on Friday. Not something the 18-200 can handle. So before my new 70-200, I either rented or skipped the night games.
  • MomaZunkMomaZunk Registered Users Posts: 421 Major grins
    edited February 22, 2011
    I really need to start proof reading BEFORE I hit the post button.
  • Butterfly2011Butterfly2011 Registered Users Posts: 269 Major grins
    edited February 23, 2011
    More questions about which lenses
    Ok Thank u! Are there any other lenses that I should consider? Im just kinda confused in this area there are so many choices! I need professional clear crisp quality imiages.
    So for Outdoor Portraits (that also involve kids) and Weddings u think I should use lenses stated above.
    How about nature?
    Indoor- Im thinking about getting the Nikon SB-700 flash is that a good choice, to me it sounds like I will get good results.
    Are there any wide angle lenses that I should consider?
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited February 23, 2011
    If you are doing weddings for hire you must have a second camera and 2 flashes. Stuff happens and a single camera and flash won't be enough.

    For professional portraiture you will need at least 2 flashes and potentially more. You'll also need light stands, umbrellas, softboxes, reflectors, maybe some backgrounds and holders, etc.

    Most importantly you need to know how to use all of this equipment, efficiently and fluently and effectively.

    Take some photography courses and become a "second shooter" for a while until you gain both experience and confidence. When you can "demonstrate" with images that you can produce quality photographic products, you will be ready for paying customers. (Develop a portfolio.)

    (Sermon off)

    For nature and landscape photography you may want to consider a "super-wide" zoom lens. Nikon has a rather nice:

    Nikkor 10-24mm, f3.5-4.5G ED AF-S DX

    ... but you can also consider:

    Sigma 10-20mm, f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM
    Tokina 12-24mm, f/4 PRO DX
    Tokina AT-X 11-16mm, f2.8 PRO DX
    Tamron SP 11-18mm, f4.5-f5.6 Di-II LD Aspherical [IF]
    Tamron SP 10-24mm, f3.5-f4.5 Di-II LD Aspherical [IF]

    These lenses can provide a vista landscape as well as very good interior coverage in a single image.

    For formal portraiture, especially head shots and head and shoulder shots, I strongly suggest a fast prime lens in the 85mm-135mm range. Consider:

    Nikkor 85mm, f1.8D
    Nikkor 85mm, f1.4D IF
    Nikkor DC 135mm, f2D

    These lenses keep perspective distortion to a minimum and can provide excellent separation from the background with limited DOF and they also have very nice bokeh. (The 85mm, f1.8 has the worst bokeh of this bunch but it's not all that bad.)

    You'll need more gear as you and your photography progresses but I suggest that all of the above, plus my previous recommendations, can meet your current stated needs.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Butterfly2011Butterfly2011 Registered Users Posts: 269 Major grins
    edited February 27, 2011
    Has anyone used a Tamron vc 70-300mm how does that compare to the Tamron 70-200mm? Also looking for good tripod for D90 what kind should I look for?
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited February 27, 2011
    Has anyone used a Tamron vc 70-300mm how does that compare to the Tamron 70-200mm? ...

    The Tamron AF 70-300mm, f4.0-5.6 SP Di VC USD XLD is more for good light and mostly outdoor shooting. It lacks the sharpness and light efficiency of the Tamron AF 70-200mm, f2.8 Di LD IF Macro, and the 70-300mm has much worse bokeh.

    The VC version of the 70-300mm does have the ability to shoot earlier and later in the day, or in overcast conditions, but only with static subjects. VC does nothing to improve the light efficiency of the lens or stopping motion of a dynamic subject. Basically a stabilized lens just means less tripod/monopod use, but it cannot replace a physical stabilization when you really need it. Lens stabilization also slows down acquisition because it takes just a moment in order for the stabilization to engage.

    A faster aperture lens like the 70-200mm, f2.8, also aids autofocus speed and accuracy.

    Bottom line, the slower 70-300mm is an OK lens for walking around outdoors but the faster 70-200mm is what you want for most of your intended applications for a longer zoom lens.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Butterfly2011Butterfly2011 Registered Users Posts: 269 Major grins
    edited February 27, 2011
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited February 27, 2011
    Thanks for the info, you know alot!

    Happy to help.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • Butterfly2011Butterfly2011 Registered Users Posts: 269 Major grins
    edited February 27, 2011
    Ok how about lens filters, which brand are better than others (dont want to spend too much).

    Same question, but about a tripod?
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited February 27, 2011
    Ok how about lens filters, which brand are better than others (dont want to spend too much).

    ...

    I use Hoya HMC and B+W multicoated filters. You need to spend more than the cheapest filters because they, the cheapest, "will" degrade image quality. Stay away from the Tiffen brand completely.

    A good source for filters is:

    http://2filter.com/
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited February 27, 2011
    ... Same question, but about a tripod?

    My tripod needs are lot different than most and so I purchase and own very different tripods and heads from most.

    My favorite tripod and head for dSLR general use is Manfrotto 755XB MDEVE legs, with integral 50mm half-ball, and an older Manfrotto 3047 head (model III).

    I also use a Manfrotto "elbow bracket" for holding camera/lens combinations that don't have a tripod ring. The elbow bracket keeps the center-of-balance proper and the bracket includes an anti-rotation device which adapts to multiple camera bodies.

    http://www.amazon.com/Manfrotto-755XB-Aluminum-Tripod-Leveler/dp/B000U8X2G6
    http://www.amazon.com/Bogen-3047-Deluxe-Tripod-Release/dp/B000077VZW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=photo&qid=1246365867&sr=1-1
    http://tiny.cc/UXL4Y
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • jasoncgjasoncg Registered Users Posts: 1 Beginner grinner
    edited February 28, 2011
    I have a D90 and several of the above lenses - Nikon 18-200 VR, Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VR, Tamron 17-50 f2.8 non-VC, and the Tokina 12-24 f4. I started with the 18-200 and almost never use it any more unless I'm traveling and need a walk-around lens. It's great for that, but lacks the sharpness and capability of the f2.8 lenses. The Tammy 17-50 f2.8 is a steal IMO - mine is tack sharp and creates beautiful images for half the cost (and weight) of the Nikon 17-55 f2.8. The Tokina makes some beautiful ones too.

    I've thought about selling the 18-200 VR since it is so infrequently used, but it still works for touristy photos walking around cities so it's still hanging around. The Tammy is what's on my camera most of the time.
  • Butterfly2011Butterfly2011 Registered Users Posts: 269 Major grins
    edited February 28, 2011
    More questions for ya of coarse. Looking more into lens filters, which there are many kinds polarizer,ultraviolet,skylight & ect.., Im interested in the polarizer. Lets just say I want a filter lens that brightens colors, wheather its the lake, portraits, nature. Without having to buy 10 diff. ones. Too bad they dont have a package deal of filters that you need for lens. Anyway whats your thought.
    Thanks!
  • MomaZunkMomaZunk Registered Users Posts: 421 Major grins
    edited March 2, 2011
    I use the Hoya HD series UV on all of my lens.
    I use the Hoya HD polarizer as well. It is super thin, so get a filter wrench if you get that one.

    I had the cheaper Hoya Super HMC UV and Polarizer. The HD series passes more light. For the Super HMC polarizer, I actually liked the additional sunglasses effect for bight afternoon light. I sold it though.
  • Art ScottArt Scott Registered Users Posts: 8,959 Major grins
    edited March 3, 2011
    A circular pola is best...but I do not recommend screw in filters of any sort...since you are going to have many lenses you truly need to look at Lee and Singh Ray filters and the lesser expensive Cokin filter holders and adapters....this way one filter will fit many lenses......I do not use filters to keep lenses clean, no filter is dust proof and the threads will get filled with stuff and then they are hard to get loose.....I have to take water pump pliers to filters to get them unstuck and they were expensive brass threaded filters.....and it is not only the cheap filters that degrade images...all filters degrade images some what......and I have had lenses damaged beyond repair when a filters broke and the glass scratched my lens....so now for well over 25yrs I have no protective filters on my lenses, but I do keep the lens hood on all the time........
    "Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website

  • Butterfly2011Butterfly2011 Registered Users Posts: 269 Major grins
    edited March 4, 2011
Sign In or Register to comment.