My first -and only- kingfisher

marlofmarlof Registered Users Posts: 1,833 Major grins
edited September 25, 2005 in Wildlife
Last year, while we were in Zambia, we saw tons of nice looking birds. Since I'm not a birder, I was not prepared for that, having only the 200mm reach of my Sony DSC-F828. Big birds like storks etc. ended up recognizable, but when we met up with the tiny birds like this Malachite Kingfisher, I had to rely heavily on cropping.

12309842-L.jpg

This year I'll return to Africa, with my Olympus E-1, and 560mm reach. I hope I'll be able to catch some nice shots, also of the beautiful smaller creatures that live there.
enjoy being here while getting there

Comments

  • bfjrbfjr Registered Users Posts: 10,980 Major grins
    edited September 24, 2005
    Your 1st not to shabby and a completing different looking one thumb.gif
    Not only do you need big (lens) reach but lighting reactions to get a decent image. :D

    Are yours as skittish and elusive ??
  • AllenAllen Registered Users Posts: 10,013 Major grins
    edited September 24, 2005
    I like these kind of shots, not just a bird close up, but composed in a lovely natural
    scene with sufficent bird details. I use a tcon17 with my 828 and still can't get out
    there, but it helps.
    Very nice,
    AL
    Al - Just a volunteer here having fun
    My Website index | My Blog
  • marlofmarlof Registered Users Posts: 1,833 Major grins
    edited September 24, 2005
    Thanks for your nice comments.
    bfjr wrote:
    Not only do you need big (lens) reach but lighting reactions to get a decent image. :D Are yours as skittish and elusive ??

    I wouldn't exactly call them mine, since they're over 10 hrs flying from here (the malachite is specific for Africa, it's some sort of dwarf kingfisher, so a tiny small bird...), but yeah they were very hard to catch. Saw some real nice kingfisher doing it's thing (dive for food) in a hippo pool, but I was just not fast for that. Although I do not have the machine gun, I hope the 3 shots per second of the E-1 will be able to catch one of those dives if I see it next time.
    Allen wrote:
    I like these kind of shots, not just a bird close up, but composed in a lovely natural scene with sufficent bird details.

    I like them too, but in all honesty this is just using the rule: don't try to masque what your camera is not, but use what it is to the fullest. The 828 was excellent in grabbing landscapes and larger wildlife. It only was good for birding when the bird was an accessory to the landscape (or large enough, like a stork). Tiny ones like this or the carmine bee-eater (as in the following shots) only made it as an accessory. ;)

    carmine bee-eater on top of a dead tree
    12315033-M.jpg

    carmine bee eater colony on the bank of the zambezi river
    12315096-M.jpg
    enjoy being here while getting there
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited September 25, 2005
    You did better with your 200mm than I have with my 700mm in your king fisher capture. thumb.gif
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Sign In or Register to comment.