Options

Possible error on display-quality FAQ?

mattwrightmattwright Registered Users Posts: 124 Major grins
edited March 6, 2011 in Bug Reporting
In the section "Resizing & sharpening" on:

http://www.smugmug.com/help/display-quality

The butterfly photo on the far left (0.00 sharpening) appears *noticably* sharper than the middle photo (0.20 sharpening). Look particularly at the pointy things in the middle of the flower.

Are a) my eyes messed up, b) these images incorrectly labeled, or c) already sharp images actually becoming blurrier with 0.2 sharpening applied?

Although harder to tell for sure, it seems like the photo below the butterfly may also have this behavior, seen particularly in the hair/eyebrows.

Thanks,

Matt

Comments

  • Options
    SteveMSteveM Registered Users Posts: 482 Major grins
    edited February 24, 2011
    mattwright wrote: »
    In the section "Resizing & sharpening" on:

    http://www.smugmug.com/help/display-quality

    The butterfly photo on the far left (0.00 sharpening) appears *noticably* sharper than the middle photo (0.20 sharpening). Look particularly at the pointy things in the middle of the flower.

    Are a) my eyes messed up, b) these images incorrectly labeled, or c) already sharp images actually becoming blurrier with 0.2 sharpening applied?

    Although harder to tell for sure, it seems like the photo below the butterfly may also have this behavior, seen particularly in the hair/eyebrows.

    Thanks,

    Matt

    Hi Matt,

    Hmmm! I'm checking into this now. Right or wrong, you're the only one that's noticed this in the years we've had this page up, so, good eye! It seems we need either more of an explanation on the process, or to shuffle our photos around to the correct order. I'll be finding out!

    Thanks for the heads up, Matt!
    Steve Mills
    BizDev Account Manager
    Image Specialist & Pro Concierge

    http://www.downriverphotography.com
  • Options
    mattwrightmattwright Registered Users Posts: 124 Major grins
    edited March 6, 2011
    SteveM wrote: »
    Hmmm! I'm checking into this now.

    Thanks for checking on it Steve, any updates? --Matt
Sign In or Register to comment.