It's engagement season right?
tenoverthenose
Registered Users Posts: 815 Major grins
This is from last night. I met the couple and just wandered around the streets outside of their house. So much fun to just walk around with no plan and make things happen.
As always, more and the full story on my blogosphere.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
As always, more and the full story on my blogosphere.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0
Comments
Did the same just the other day + Once I actually walked into a couple that got engaged *that* day! ... that was fun!
Nice set!
www.intruecolors.com
Nikon D700 x2/D300
Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
@Angie that's a crazy story about running into that couple!
Facebook: Friend / Fan || Twitter: @shimamizu || Google Plus
yup, that's where the "eye" comes in. It's easy to shoot in gorgeous places like I just did in SF city hall... can't find a bad back drop if your tried. But finding little slices of gorgeous in the mundane..that just fit the camera frame..is challenging and satisfying. It feels like your created something out of nothing.
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
Mmmmmm bokeh
Out of curiosity, what do you charge for couples sessions? (feel free to PM me if you don't want to post that on here)
Facebook: Friend / Fan || Twitter: @shimamizu || Google Plus
Hi! I'm Wally: website | blog | facebook | IG | scotchNsniff
Nikon addict. D610, Tok 11-16, Sig 24-35, Nik 24-70/70-200vr
That was the one and only shot I took all day that was wide open. Normally I don't like to shoot my 85 at 1.2 just because of the difficulty focusing. Not sure how in this picture I managed to get them in focus - they were rocking back and forth and goofing off. I really wanted to tell them just to stand still so that I could get the picture in focus at 1.2, but I didn't want to kill the mood. Most of the frames from this spot are all in perfect focus - I got VERY lucky.
As of right now (this will be funny when someone googles this in 2018) I am charging $750 for an engagement session with a $200 print credit. I've tried my best to set up all of my shoots so that I make the same amount no matter what I am shooting, be it a wedding, engagement, studio session, etc. But at the same time I REALLY want my clients to have products in hand and be able to show off the photos. Most times they end up buying more than the original credit
Of course, this is SUPER EASY lighting that looks way cool to me. It's a single light with a tight grid (the tighter the grid, the smaller the lit area) about four feet higher than the couples head pointed at them and the garage door on a downward angle. As the circular light pattern hits the garage door from that angle, this is the shape it produces. My camera was directly underneath the light in order to keep it on axis. Of course this is very hard light, which is why it is so contrasty and cool, so it works better on some subjects that others.
Don't kid yourself Daniel, it still takes the talent you have to create those great shots even in SF city hall.
Hi! I'm Wally: website | blog | facebook | IG | scotchNsniff
Nikon addict. D610, Tok 11-16, Sig 24-35, Nik 24-70/70-200vr
Well a snoot would make it look quite a bit different. The falloff of the grid is what makes the lighting here. A snoot (at this distance) would have a much harder transition.
I'm still gonna go home and play anyways lol
Hi! I'm Wally: website | blog | facebook | IG | scotchNsniff
Nikon addict. D610, Tok 11-16, Sig 24-35, Nik 24-70/70-200vr