3D Photography - Should we start thinking about this?
PupWeb
Registered Users Posts: 166 Major grins
I just saw the new Nintendo DS will have a 3D camera, and made me start to think. Is this going to be the next big thing in photography? I'm just catching up to photofusion, next photofusion + 3D
What do you think?
What do you think?
0
Comments
But the pessimist in me says that 3D televsion is not going to take off. I really don't enjoy 3D movies all that much anyway. But the optimist in me says that I have looked into getting custom 3D Viewmaster reels made to do this sort of stuff with. I still have a warm spot in my heart over Viewmaster and the system is still available in the toy aisle.
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
agree
although surely it won't be that difficult to build the effect from the glasses into a secondary screen just in front of the actual viewing screen.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
Agreed.
I hate wearing those glasses, over my Rx glasses.
DavidBroadwell.com, My Smugmug Home
It did not take off as expected with film...neither did stereo pix......3d has been around for a long time...old 3D was something, but movies like avatar left me unhappy....nothing really jumped off the screen....I believe it wil always be a special niche.......a local store sells several hundred 3D book marks every month....to kids at close to $10 a pop.....
It may become fad-ish for a bit. but in truth, that is what we do in regular photography anyway, we give depth perception. Calling what we do 2D isn't true.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
I've been looking at Sony cameras reacently, all there newer compact cameras seem to incorporate 3D photography. Even the ones that only have one lens, wghich is kind of interesting. See it here
I guess it works well for them, if everyonere has a camera that can take 3D images they'll be morer likely to want to buy a TV that can display them. The same as blu-ray beating HDDVD because everyone had a PS3 that could already play them. Very clever.
But until you can hang a 3D print on a wall and see it w/o needing glasses....
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
I don't see people rushing out to get 3D TVs, and the momentum will likely be lost. Look how long it took for color to overtake black and white in TV. Yet color had an inevitability to it. No matter how slowly people ponied up the money, there was no holding color back. Same with HD. But 3D doesn't have the same inevitability to it. You just don't need it the way you need color and higher resolution. Anyway, that's what I'm banking on, cause I'd love to see it stuck in its niche.
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
You used to be able to get 3D prints from 3x5 to 8x10...and you did not need any special glasses.....pricey yes.....maybe that was just thru the Nimslo company.........but it has not really caught on in almost 100 yrs, so I do not see it happening anytime soon.......
Our new Imax theater is not getting the magnitude of business they had hoped for either......I have not been yet and missed the only movie so far I was interested in.......Sanctum.......ooooh weeell.....dunno
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
Moderator of the People and Go Figure forums
My Smug Site
You can try it out yourself without needing a "3d" camera.
http://www.wikihow.com/Make-3D-Photos