eagle thats blurry

racefanracefan Registered Users Posts: 133 Major grins
edited April 2, 2011 in Wildlife
for some reason they have all come out blurry...

3-26-11038.jpg

Comments

  • IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited March 28, 2011
    Was your focus point on the sky, or were you inadvertently in manual focus mode thinking you were in auto? It sure looks to me like a focus issue, and not motion blur or camera shake.
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
  • DeVermDeVerm Registered Users Posts: 405 Major grins
    edited March 28, 2011
    I get those when I forget to switch IS off or into panning mode... ne_nau.gif

    ciao!
    Nick.
    ciao!
    Nick.

    my equipment: Canon 5D2, 7D, full list here
    my Smugmug site: here
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited March 28, 2011
    Which lens?

    How much experience do you have with the lens?

    How many focus points?

    What AF mode?
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited March 28, 2011
    Ypur shuutter speed was 1/2000 sec so I would say it definitely was the focusing. The D90 has 11 focus points and it does an OK job but its not the fasted AF around. What focusing mode was the camera set for?
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited March 28, 2011
    Looking at the image more closely, I'm even more puzzled. There are enough tree branches that are both nearer and farther than the bird, that SOMETHING should be crisp. Nothing is.headscratch.gif
    :lurk
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
  • racefanracefan Registered Users Posts: 133 Major grins
    edited March 28, 2011
    ive had the lens for awhile now, i was shooting in auto focus, dynamic focus point and ive never had an issue in the past thats why im wondering if its the camera its self. im debating on sending in the camera into nikon to have it looked over cause i still have the warrenty on it..
    i tried to even take a pic of a robin tonight but it turned out the same and in both pics i was using a tripod..

    robin007.jpg
  • IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited March 28, 2011
    Is it the 80-400?
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
  • IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited March 28, 2011
    racefan wrote: »
    . . . im wondering if its the camera its self.

    Stick another lens on it and confirm/eliminate that factor.
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
  • racefanracefan Registered Users Posts: 133 Major grins
    edited March 28, 2011
    thanks ill give that aa try in something in the house..
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited March 28, 2011
    The 80-400 might be the problem. I found the AF to be very slow on my earlier cameras, it got faster on my D300 and D3. I noticed that my 80-400 had difficulty maintaining AF on a subject. I was constantly having to reacquire focus on my subjects.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • racefanracefan Registered Users Posts: 133 Major grins
    edited March 28, 2011
    i guess i forgot to mention that im using a sigma 135 - 400 which i know is a little slow focusing at a distance..
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited April 2, 2011
    The Sigma 135-400mm f/4.5-5.6 APO Aspherical RF is one of those lenses that seems to have broad sample variations and generally people either really like the lens or they don't like it much at all. If you have the light the lens does seem to respond to small apertures so try f11 if you can, especially at the long end of the range (300-400mm).

    If possible, try it on another body. If it performs similarly on a second body then it might be a bad copy of the lens. Also try manual focus using Live View if you have it, to rule out AF mis-calibration.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Sign In or Register to comment.