Is there a good travel tripod that can handle FF camera with Telephoto Zoom?
bobbyk
Registered Users Posts: 45 Big grins
I wrote another little post to my blog about my experience with a Benro Travel Angel.
You can read it here:
http://www.bobkeenanphoto.com/benro-travel-ange-c0691tb00-reviewed/
The short version is that it was great a couple years ago with a smaller dslr and kit lens but it's not doing the job with my current set-up. Like a Canon 5DMkII, and a 70-200mm f2.8... sometimes with a tele-extender.
Anybody have any good experiences with a travel tripod that can fit in a normal size suit case (does not have to be carryon)?
--
Bob Keenan
http://www.bobkeenanphoto.com/
You can read it here:
http://www.bobkeenanphoto.com/benro-travel-ange-c0691tb00-reviewed/
The short version is that it was great a couple years ago with a smaller dslr and kit lens but it's not doing the job with my current set-up. Like a Canon 5DMkII, and a 70-200mm f2.8... sometimes with a tele-extender.
Anybody have any good experiences with a travel tripod that can fit in a normal size suit case (does not have to be carryon)?
--
Bob Keenan
http://www.bobkeenanphoto.com/
0
Comments
I spent several hours last night (yes hours... I go nuts over this stuff) making a spread sheet on all of the tripods that I would consider " Travel Tripods" that could hold my Canon 5DmkII and a 70-200mm f2.8 lens nice and still.
It comes down to the Gitzo 2540T or the Gitzo 2541 OR the Feisol CT-3442S or the Feisol CT-3442.
The Gitzo path leads to a $900-1000 price tag (with a new head)
The Feisol path leads to a $500-600 price tag (with a new head)
I have read nothing but good comments and reviews on all of these tripod and their companies. Of course there are many more Gitzo users out there. The $400 savings from Feisol lures me in....but I made a mistake before when I got the Benro travel angel.
I can afford either one...but the Gitzo stings and bites into my next lens budget.
What to do...
Which head are you getting? I recently got the Really Right Stuff TVC 23, and it is by far a better tripod than the Gitzo. They have the TVC24 which looks like it meets your specs. It does cost more, but it is a fantastic tripod. Like I said, significantly better and more stable than the Gitzo.
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Folded length- <20in
Max height wo column- >52"
Max height with column - >62"
Max weight- <4lbs
Max Load - >20lbs
As for the head - I want a ball head. I probably don't want to spend more than $300. It should fit the tripod without screwing up the fold diameter and it should have a load capability of at least 20lbs.
I have the TVC 24 and even though they are 4 section legs it is very solid.
http://www.danalphotos.com
http://www.pluralsight.com
http://twitter.com/d114
Clinging on at Bryce.
You are right. They look like they would work. But are they worth that much compared to a similar product at Gitzo for $700 or Feisol for $300?
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Nam et ipsa scientia potestas est.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
That is the conclusion I came to today. I went with the 2541 and a Kirk head.
I posted the question yesterday looking for advice on what is a good travel tripod for a FF camera with larger lenses like a canon 70-200mm f2.8. I took the responses, did a bunch of research, and ordered one today. The Gitzo GT2541. It will be my first Gitzo so I am looking forward to that. If you want to see the spreadsheet I came up with you can see it here:
http://www.bobkeenanphoto.com/?p=1518
If you have this tripod let me know what you think of it pls.