I really like that first shot. In the second, they eyes appear much over worked. They don't "match up" to the rest of the image and, in fact, make her teeth appear yellow.
Very cute model.
One has the potential to be a very nice shot...but the large watermark has to go for that to happen.
Also looks underexposed.
Two is also underexposed and as mentioned the eyes are over done.
With eyes and teeth....if you feel you MUST work them over, less is definitely more.
The Very Best portrait photographers....I mean really good... and editing experts...can get away with doing a lot of work to eyes and teeth because it fits in with their overall processing. Average photos do not stand up well to extra editing of the eyes and teeth.....so easy to overdo it and then it just looks odd.
Comments
Jeff
-Need help with Dgrin?; Wedding Photography Resources
-My Website - Blog - Tips for Senior Portraiture
One has the potential to be a very nice shot...but the large watermark has to go for that to happen.
Also looks underexposed.
Two is also underexposed and as mentioned the eyes are over done.
With eyes and teeth....if you feel you MUST work them over, less is definitely more.
The Very Best portrait photographers....I mean really good... and editing experts...can get away with doing a lot of work to eyes and teeth because it fits in with their overall processing. Average photos do not stand up well to extra editing of the eyes and teeth.....so easy to overdo it and then it just looks odd.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
#2 - Demon eyes. Too weird for me.
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
I get a little carried away with her eyes #2 when working really closeup on the eyes.
Jake
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.