Data isn't data until it is backed up in two locations, one offsite.
MarkR
Registered Users Posts: 2,099 Major grins
So, my iMac harddrive was dying, in all the obvious ways. (Slowdowns, weird noises, I/O errors, etc.), and since it was just under warranty, I had it replaced at the local Apple store, after first making sure that everything on it was backed up on an external HDD through Time Machine.
Got the iMac back, plugged in the Time Machine, and ... nothing. Not a sausage. Ran Disk Utility and determined that the backup drive was in worse shape than my original iMac drive. Everything on it, over 100 gigabytes of pictures, documents, and applications were gone forever.
Or would be, if I didn't have a crashplan account.
I'm in the process of restoring everything now, and it's slow going, but it looks like I will not lose any photos or documents.
Moral of the story: don't just rely on a Time Machine-like backup solution. Million-to-one failures crop up nine times out of ten. Get a second backup solution, preferably one that is off-site, and keep it up to date. :thumb
Got the iMac back, plugged in the Time Machine, and ... nothing. Not a sausage. Ran Disk Utility and determined that the backup drive was in worse shape than my original iMac drive. Everything on it, over 100 gigabytes of pictures, documents, and applications were gone forever.
Or would be, if I didn't have a crashplan account.
I'm in the process of restoring everything now, and it's slow going, but it looks like I will not lose any photos or documents.
Moral of the story: don't just rely on a Time Machine-like backup solution. Million-to-one failures crop up nine times out of ten. Get a second backup solution, preferably one that is off-site, and keep it up to date. :thumb
0
Comments
The IT community actually has a guideline about this. In addition to "Have multiple backups" and "Get them offsite," the situation above is why they also say "Verify your backups." In other words test the restore capability to make sure the backups are actually good. Apparently the situation you ran into happens far too often...bad data tapes, deteriorated CDs...
Glad you had enough redundancy!
As a member of the IT community, I obviously agree!
But sometimes us IT-types don't always follow our own advice when it comes to our personal computers.
(In other news, auto mechanics sometimes skimp on the maintenance on their own cars, and doctors don't always follow their own health advice. .)
What I didn't admit in my post is I haven't even been checking my own backups! Last time I needed to retrieve files from my clone and also from my Time Machine, luckily it did work both times. But I'm just as lazy as anybody, it looks like...
I've got fiber and I'm trying out CrashplanPro. Initially the uploads ran over 8mbs (over 3GB per hour). Now they are running at about at less than 1 mbs per second. I've done a couple of speed tests that register over 8mbs upload consistently and when I do uploads to Amazon S3 they run at over 8mbs like my test show.
TIA for an info,
Dan
http://www.danalphotos.com
http://www.pluralsight.com
http://twitter.com/d114
What I'm finding, though, is the rate the backup runs at seems to slowed down. Last week I was backing up 3GB an hour now it's less than 1GB an hour. Crashplan says they have no limits on the backup rate so curious if others have seen this.
BTW Backblaze also has no limit on the amount you can backup too.
Dan
http://www.danalphotos.com
http://www.pluralsight.com
http://twitter.com/d114
I just checked on CrashPlan this morning.. It says it will take 5.5 YEARS to complete my upload. That's with 2MBit upload speeds... D'oh
http://www.danalphotos.com
http://www.pluralsight.com
http://twitter.com/d114
http://www.danalphotos.com
http://www.pluralsight.com
http://twitter.com/d114