Island in the fog - the 10 stop version
eoren1
Registered Users Posts: 2,391 Major grins
Doug suggested I reshoot a recent pano with a 10-stop and, as we are in day 3 of leaving in pea soup, I thought I would comply.
Here is the new version (I think I like this one more than the prior:wink)
Original thread with prior attempts for comparison: http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=197391
Here is the new version (I think I like this one more than the prior:wink)
Original thread with prior attempts for comparison: http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=197391
Eyal
My site | Non-MHD Landscapes |Google+ | Twitter | Facebook | Smugmug photos
My site | Non-MHD Landscapes |Google+ | Twitter | Facebook | Smugmug photos
0
Comments
--- Denise
Musings & ramblings at https://denisegoldberg.blogspot.com
Gallery: http://cornflakeaz.smugmug.com/
My site | Non-MHD Landscapes |Google+ | Twitter | Facebook | Smugmug photos
I like it as well. There is interesting mix of sharpness at the left foreground edge of the island, and hazy murk elsewhere. I also think the colors of the dock and house to the left add interest and variety.
The only thing semi-obvious that catches my eye, at least at this small size, is the banding where the frames were stitched? Some of them coincide with tree reflections maybe, but the one at the right, towards the end of the island I think is noticeable and maybe the one that aligns with the red structure on the dock?
I'm not sure what you're using to stitch, but I have found Hugin to be excellent AND it's free. I'll convert RAW files to high quality TIFFs and then stitch and process.
I tried to find a larger version on your website but couldn't. Your work is outstanding.
John
I sent these from Lightroom to CS5 and used the merge to panorama function. I have PTgui but find it a bit clunky and not as seamless a transition.
I have to say I did not notice the banding. I did do some clone work to remove the crane that lies atop the red structure and to remove a few boats in the background immediately in front of that crane. I wonder if that is what you are seeing. I'll have to take another look at the original when I'm home and can see it larger.
Appreciate the critique and the kind words about my work.
E
My site | Non-MHD Landscapes |Google+ | Twitter | Facebook | Smugmug photos
Sure thing...once I fix the banding (I can see it on my iPhone but not larger images )
My site | Non-MHD Landscapes |Google+ | Twitter | Facebook | Smugmug photos
Website: Tom Price Photography
Blog: Capturing Photons
Facebook: Tom Price Photography
One other suggestion. It appears that you shot this series with your camera in a horizontal position. The result is an aspect ratio that is very wide in relationship to its height. Next time, try shooting the series with the camera in a vertical position. It takes more shots to cover the same distance, but while you still get a panoramic, the resulting aspect ratio is a bit more pleasing. This is all just my opinion, of course, especially if the effect you were looking for is exactly what you shot.
Panos can be very tricky, especially when shooting water, since it usually is moving. Again, very nice shot.
Sony R1, Bogen Tri and Mono Pods, Epson Photo Storage device, and Kata rain gear. I travel light...
www.catgraphpics.biz
I went with the landscape orientation mostly because it was faster and there was not much that was interesting above or below the crop shown...I likely would have cropped to this ration anyway.
As for the WB, I shot in Auto but manually corrected it in Lightroom and synced all five photos so the WB should have been the same for all. The settings were otherwise manual. I started a pano in PTGui but haven't had a chance to play with it in CS5 yet.
Appreciate the comments
E
My site | Non-MHD Landscapes |Google+ | Twitter | Facebook | Smugmug photos