Actor's publicity photographs
I just finished processing this shoot. We had a stylist so we tried to show off the clothes a bit more than usual for an actor's photos. What do you think ?
1
2
3
4
5
( They look saturated and red compared to the saved for web jpg's I'm seeing in photoshop... any ideas or is it just from photobucket's fault ? )
1
2
3
4
5
( They look saturated and red compared to the saved for web jpg's I'm seeing in photoshop... any ideas or is it just from photobucket's fault ? )
0
Comments
What's the intended use for the remainder- web/promo packages, or submission shots? I can see the "fun" ones being great as part of a website, but they'd likely be somewhat off the beaten track for getting auditioins (depending on what the actor was submitting for, of course).
I prefer 2B, 3A, 4A and 5B to their counterparts, but YMMV.
Looks like a fun shoot!
ETA: Yes, they do look slightly to the warm side. If the originals are fine - ie on your computer, saved as maximum quality jpgs or tiffs - I wouldn't worry about it. No experience with photobucket so can't help there!
It is about how that thing looks photographed." Garry Winogrand
Avatar credit: photograph by Duane Michals- picture of me, 'Smash Palace' album
They will be used by him as a sort of book or showcase, he needed to update his "portfolio". I'm not sure if he will send them to auditions but I don't see why not, as long as it fits the description. Variety was a concern.
I'm not 100% on this as they were shot in April, but I'm pretty sure the headshot was lit with two medium softboxes above and below camera and at least one more light to blow out the background. The highlights you're seeing are just spill from the background.
( I used save for web which usually gives good results, but here on firefox they do look different )
Edit: Ah ! Much better.
Facebook
500px