Bridalveil Fall Rainbow, Yosemite

SeaSurfnBirdSeaSurfnBird Registered Users Posts: 66 Big grins
edited June 21, 2011 in Landscapes
Bridalveil-Fall-rainbow-L.jpg
Shot with my Nikon D90 on June 9th, 2011 at 7:14 P.M. at 0.125 seconds, f/32, 100 ISO and a focal length of 62mm. I used a polarizer on my lens to bring out the rainbow colors. Shot it right from the parking lot.
Please let me know what you think...
Jeff
Jeff Parry Photography
Nature, Lighthouses, Seascapes, Landscapes & Kite Aerial Fisheye Lens Photography
My Photos: www.jeffparryphotography.com
My Blog: http://jeffparryphotography.blogspot.com/
My Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.jeffparryphotography

Comments

  • schmooschmoo Registered Users Posts: 8,468 Major grins
    edited June 18, 2011
    A certain Dgrinner went out that way this week specifically for the great moonbows. Looks like you had some good luck there, too thumb.gif
  • Logic 7Logic 7 Registered Users Posts: 89 Big grins
    edited June 19, 2011
    Did you mean 200 ISO?
    Jeff
  • IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited June 19, 2011
    Exif says ISO 100 ne_nau.gif
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
  • SeaSurfnBirdSeaSurfnBird Registered Users Posts: 66 Big grins
    edited June 19, 2011
    Logic 7 wrote: »
    Did you mean 200 ISO?

    Got me nervous! Yes, info says 100 ISO.
    Jeff Parry Photography
    Nature, Lighthouses, Seascapes, Landscapes & Kite Aerial Fisheye Lens Photography
    My Photos: www.jeffparryphotography.com
    My Blog: http://jeffparryphotography.blogspot.com/
    My Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.jeffparryphotography
  • Logic 7Logic 7 Registered Users Posts: 89 Big grins
    edited June 20, 2011
    D90's dont do 100 ISO. They have low 1 which the equivilent of it
    Jeff
  • IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited June 20, 2011
    Logic 7 wrote: »
    D90's dont do 100 ISO. They have low 1 which the equivilent of it

    And the difference is . ? . ?
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
  • Logic 7Logic 7 Registered Users Posts: 89 Big grins
    edited June 21, 2011
    The difference is that there is manipulation done to get it to the lower ISO and Nikon doesnt recommend it. 2nd I wouldnt have thought that it would have showed up as ISO 100 in the EXIF data as Nikon doesnt have an exact ISO number listed for low1. I guess it doesnt really matter its just curious to me.
    Jeff
  • SeaSurfnBirdSeaSurfnBird Registered Users Posts: 66 Big grins
    edited June 21, 2011
    Logic 7 wrote: »
    The difference is that there is manipulation done to get it to the lower ISO and Nikon doesnt recommend it. 2nd I wouldnt have thought that it would have showed up as ISO 100 in the EXIF data as Nikon doesnt have an exact ISO number listed for low1. I guess it doesnt really matter its just curious to me.
    Wow, you are correct! The Magic Lantern Guide to the Nikon D90 says the digital sensors do not react the same way as film and "the standard base ISO sensitivity is where the sensor usually delivers optimal performance, which is ISO 200 in case of the D90. At settings lower than this, the dynamic range of the camera is effectively reduced! Although low and midtone values are preserved, there is a tendency for highlight values to become overexposed more quickly."
    My smugmug EXIF info does say 100. I'll have to look at my Lightroom EXIF info now...
    Thanks!
    Jeff Parry Photography
    Nature, Lighthouses, Seascapes, Landscapes & Kite Aerial Fisheye Lens Photography
    My Photos: www.jeffparryphotography.com
    My Blog: http://jeffparryphotography.blogspot.com/
    My Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.jeffparryphotography
  • Doug SolisDoug Solis Registered Users Posts: 1,190 Major grins
    edited June 21, 2011
    Wow the amount of flow is unreal. Nice work.
  • SeaSurfnBirdSeaSurfnBird Registered Users Posts: 66 Big grins
    edited June 21, 2011
    Thanks Doug! Yes a banner year as far as water flow, snow melt etc
    Jeff Parry Photography
    Nature, Lighthouses, Seascapes, Landscapes & Kite Aerial Fisheye Lens Photography
    My Photos: www.jeffparryphotography.com
    My Blog: http://jeffparryphotography.blogspot.com/
    My Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.jeffparryphotography
  • IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited June 21, 2011
    YMMV, but my real world experience (D70, D200, D300, D700) is that the degradation in IQ when using ISOs in the "Lo" range is not discernable. Maybe under laboratory conditions there's measureable inferiority, but when I've used them, I was happy with what I got. But I agree, you should not "expose to the right."

    And when imported into Lightroom, the ISO reads 100 for an image captured as Lo-1.0.
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
Sign In or Register to comment.