D90 or D300s
LRussoPhoto
Registered Users Posts: 458 Major grins
Going to my daughters dance recitel this weekend. What camera would give me better high iso results the d90 or the d300s? I would rather take the d90 only because it's smaller but would take the d300 is that would produce better results. Any suggestions?
D300s D90
Nikon 18-105mm,Nikon 18-200mm,Sigma 24-70mm f2.8, Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8
http://LouRusso.SmugMug.com
Nikon 18-105mm,Nikon 18-200mm,Sigma 24-70mm f2.8, Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8
http://LouRusso.SmugMug.com
0
Comments
My site 365 Project
Nikon 18-105mm,Nikon 18-200mm,Sigma 24-70mm f2.8, Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8
http://LouRusso.SmugMug.com
BTW, I personally have shot in extremely low light for years with a D300, doing music recitals, theater, and weddings (my work) ...and I have never been TOO un-satisfied with the results as long as they're well-exposed. And as long as I assess the situation beforehand and go into the job with the right lens, I'm fine.
The AF of a D300s or a D7000 will definitely be MUCH better than a D90, but on the other hand I would rather have a D90 and a GREAT low-light lens than a D300s and a mediocre low-light lens.
Bottom line - you gotta cover ALL the bases... ;-)
=Matt=
My SmugMug Portfolio • My Astro-Landscape Photo Blog • Dgrin Weddings Forum
Just curious, why is the af on the 300 better then the 90?
Nikon 18-105mm,Nikon 18-200mm,Sigma 24-70mm f2.8, Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8
http://LouRusso.SmugMug.com
My SmugMug Portfolio • My Astro-Landscape Photo Blog • Dgrin Weddings Forum
That may well be, but That Lens will get what you want in the low light dept. And of course, even though I favor the D90 (or my GF does Due to weight!), The D300 won't add much weight considering the lens and all.