#80 - This one is tough!
Cambyses
Registered Users Posts: 141 Major grins
I think it would actually be quite hard to break a rule so visibly that you don't need to explain it in a title, and yet have a good enough picture worthy of a challenge :scratch
That said, how about the one below? It breaks only one rule on exposure, and in doing so, makes all other rules irrelevant :thumb
1. Blindness
That said, how about the one below? It breaks only one rule on exposure, and in doing so, makes all other rules irrelevant :thumb
1. Blindness
0
Comments
As long as it has an EXIF then it certainly breaks the good exposure rule
Of course it does. f/10, 1/160 sec, ISO 1000, and no flash (obviously ).
TravelwaysPhotos.com ...... Facebook
VegasGreatAttractions.com
Travelways.com
That's a rule worth breaking
My Photos
My Facebook
http://www.realphotoman.com/
Work in progress
http://www.realphotoman.net/ Zenfolio 10% off Referral Code: 1KH-5HX-5HU
Smugger for life!
Most Popular Photos
To be fair, I did take off the lens cap for this one. So, no, I did not break that rule That said, dbveto mentions a very good point above. I was in a rather dark room, and so technically my exposure was actually correct after all! I should have given it a tiny bit more light so that a heavily underexposed object could barely be noticed.
That is awesome... LMAO!!! rofl
www.lisaspeakmanphotography.com
Check out billseye photos on SmugMug
“PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”
http://jwear.smugmug.com/