SanDisk "Extreme Pro" 16 GB CF and Canon 7D?
TangoJuliet
Registered Users Posts: 269 Major grins
I was on B&H earlier looking for another CF card for my Canon 7D. I saw the SanDisk "Extreme Pro" 16GB with a 90/mbs write speed. I have an 8 GB 30/mbs and two 4 GB cards, all SanDisk, and I've never had any issues. Do you think I'd have any issues with this new card in my 7D? My experience tells me no, but I've seen many posts where people seem to have problems with some 'faster' cards in the 7D. :dunno
0
Comments
I agree that you need compatibility with the intended camera, but ignoring compatibility of the card with the intended transfer method into a computer can be just as troublesome and leads people into thinking that the camera may have caused the problem, when it was the transfer method causing the problem.
Getting back to your question I do not see people having problems with the Canon 7D and the SanDisk "Extreme Pro" 16GB, 90MB/s speed rating, compact flash card. It is my opinion that the the 7D probably cannot realize much advantage over the SanDisk "Extreme" 16GB, 60MB/s speed rating, compact flash card. I suggest that the SanDisk "Extreme" cards are probably a better value for your camera, unless you purchase an extremely fast CF card reader that can allow the extremely fast transfer speeds that the faster card allows and you wish the fastest possible transfer into a computer.
Rob Galbraith tested the Extreme Pro cards with a number of cameras back in 2009 and the Extreme Pro cards were compatible with Canon cameras even back to older cameras like the original Canon 5D and the 10D. Most of the compatibility with camera problems relate to Nikon cameras.
You can read the review here:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-10043-10255
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
I normally transfer images to the computer using an external card reader, and yes, it's a bit slow also, but I can live with it because I usually do other things while the images transfer.
www.tangojulietphotography.com
The Canon 5D MKII is probably very similar in real write and read speed rates compared to the 7D.
According to the Rob G. site the SanDisk Extreme III 30MB/s Edition 8GB has "measured" write speeds of 20-23 MB/s on the 5D MKII (JPG and RAW respectively). The SanDisk Extreme 16GB measured write speeds of 35.6 MB/s for RAW, and the SanDisk Extreme Pro 16GB measured write speeds of 40.8 MB/s for RAW files (only 5 MB/s more), but the "Pro" cards cost a lot more.
Assuming that the 7D measured similarly the SanDisk Extreme 16GB will give you most of the potential speed benefit at a better price.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Good point. I'll be renting a 5DmkII later this month along with a wide angle lens. I'll probably put my 8 GB card in it, and buy a new 16 GB Extreme for the 7D.
www.tangojulietphotography.com
How does that fit with all the card speed options?
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
Correct! The image buffer fills first and then transfers the image files to the memory card for storage. "Smart" image buffers, which most modern dSLRs have, will allow shooting until the buffer fills completely and then the shooting rate slows considerably, depending upon your shooting mode. (Small JPGs tend to clear the buffer fastest and RAW + largest JPGs tend to clear the buffer the slowest.) With smart buffers you can continue shooting even at a reduced speed, where older normal buffers would force you to suspend shooting until all image files cleared from the buffer.
Some cameras will even allow continuous shooting of JPGs at full speed until the card itself is full, assuming a fast enough card. (The Canon 5D MKII has this capability, for instance, using very fast UDMA cards.)
In short, buffer speed and buffer capacity tend to be the biggest factor in overall continuous shooting rate, followed by a fast card transfer write speed to clear the buffer.
For video-capable dSLRs, used in video mode, all you need is a card fast enough to carry the video throughput of the system. The buffer still has some potential impact, but the card write speed is more of the limiting factor.
Again, a faster card can be a tremendous aid in getting files to the computer assuming a faster card transfer mechanism as well.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
www.tangojulietphotography.com
Yes. It's better to have 2 8GB's than 1 16GB IMHO. I personally don't like going over 8GB with my cards. I have three 8GB's and a 4GB, and more backups if needed. I'll probably hold off on the 16GB's until I upgrade to that 1D Mark VII... or maybe 32GB would be better for that?
How does your testing methodology compare to that at the Rob G. site? (... write 20 Large Fine JPEG and then 10 RAW .CR2 photos to the memory card. Timing commenced when the camera's card status light illuminated, and stopped when the light went out. Each test cycle was performed 3 times ...)
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
That's where I originally got the reference for the 600x card (And used that method)
It can write 2 RAWs/second indefinitely after the buffer fills
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-10044-10297