LR 4.1 Nik Silver efex 2
D90 + D50 Sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM
Nikon 55-300 mm f4.5-5.6G ED DX AF-S VR
Landscapes, Sport and Buildings are my bag.
Chris White Cheltenham England
Interesting series. not sure I completely get it but could be just me. that being said I really really like this one! small minor nit- skin smoothing is a tad over done. It's not blending in well with the parts that are not smoothed (ie around the eye, lips and hairline.) otherwise
Interesting series. not sure I completely get it but could be just me. that being said I really really like this one! small minor nit- skin smoothing is a tad over done. It's not blending in well with the parts that are not smoothed (ie around the eye, lips and hairline.) otherwise
Thanks lilmomma for your comments! I'm not sure there's anything more "to get" than what you are seeing, that is face and hands.
I very much value your technical crit, since technique is so important to me, but I don't see what you seem to describe. There is an airbrushing effect (noise reduction on skin, smoothing and glow), which I had assessed as close to authentic to the style in -
I made some adjustments in response to comments. Thanks!
@ lilmomma, as you can see from the hairline 100% crop, the hair right on the hairline is pretty much similar to the hair further back up on the head. This leads me to think that it's not so much a smoothing blend problem as motion blur (also DOF) - the whole image has motion blur - and isn't perfect!D
i dont know maybe my eyes were being weird. i'm not seeing the hairline thing anymore but I do still see a tad bit where the skin smoothing layer ends around the eyes. But really i'm just being super nitpicky. maybe most people don't even notice it. the only reason I notice it is because i've done it myself a bazillion times. Also it is less noticible in the second shot
Seriously though, Neil, don't take my nitpicking to heart. Its really a minor nit, and i love the shot.
I used 2 580EXIIs, one in a diy 10" conical reflector with a diy diffuser above and behind shoulder L, and the other with a 1/6" Honl grid at eye level perpendicular on R, with 2 continuous light softboxes in front and high. The effect was the kind of thing I was looking for, but the shot was somewhat underexposed, certainly not ideal. I am finding that the 580EXIIs are frustrating to work with - the tolerances in terms of light coverage, control, shaping and power are not flexible enough. I am finding they just don't cut it for serious studio work. The guys that do use flahes as their main lights are using banks of them. Not a great deal of point in that, I reckon. I have never had "big" lights, but I'm gonna hafta getem!
Any thoughts from your experience with your gear, please?
i dont know maybe my eyes were being weird. i'm not seeing the hairline thing anymore but I do still see a tad bit where the skin smoothing layer ends around the eyes. But really i'm just being super nitpicky. maybe most people don't even notice it. the only reason I notice it is because i've done it myself a bazillion times. Also it is less noticible in the second shot
Seriously though, Neil, don't take my nitpicking to heart. Its really a minor nit, and i love the shot.
no probs, lilmomma! It's the pic ur criting, not me, I don't take it personally!
I really WANNA see what you mean, but I can't! Is it both eyes?
Comments
D90 + D50 Sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM
Nikon 55-300 mm f4.5-5.6G ED DX AF-S VR
Landscapes, Sport and Buildings are my bag.
Chris White Cheltenham England
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
Thanks lilmomma for your comments! I'm not sure there's anything more "to get" than what you are seeing, that is face and hands.
I very much value your technical crit, since technique is so important to me, but I don't see what you seem to describe. There is an airbrushing effect (noise reduction on skin, smoothing and glow), which I had assessed as close to authentic to the style in -
Louise Brooks –Photo © John Springer Collection/Corbis
Katherine Hepburn (c) George Hurrell/MoCP
But please open my eyes more, if you can be more specific about any problems you see. That would be invaluable to helping me improve!
Neil
PS I intend to burn in the eyelashes shadow on her right cheek.
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
@ lilmomma, as you can see from the hairline 100% crop, the hair right on the hairline is pretty much similar to the hair further back up on the head. This leads me to think that it's not so much a smoothing blend problem as motion blur (also DOF) - the whole image has motion blur - and isn't perfect!D
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
www.cameraone.biz
Seriously though, Neil, don't take my nitpicking to heart. Its really a minor nit, and i love the shot.
Thanks, Charles! Great encouragement.
I used 2 580EXIIs, one in a diy 10" conical reflector with a diy diffuser above and behind shoulder L, and the other with a 1/6" Honl grid at eye level perpendicular on R, with 2 continuous light softboxes in front and high. The effect was the kind of thing I was looking for, but the shot was somewhat underexposed, certainly not ideal. I am finding that the 580EXIIs are frustrating to work with - the tolerances in terms of light coverage, control, shaping and power are not flexible enough. I am finding they just don't cut it for serious studio work. The guys that do use flahes as their main lights are using banks of them. Not a great deal of point in that, I reckon. I have never had "big" lights, but I'm gonna hafta getem!
Any thoughts from your experience with your gear, please?
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
no probs, lilmomma! It's the pic ur criting, not me, I don't take it personally!
I really WANNA see what you mean, but I can't! Is it both eyes?
btw are you viewing on a Win or Mac?
100% crop -
Thanks.
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003085685580
Thanks John!
Neil
http://www.behance.net/brosepix