The Girls of the Jersey Shore

kirbinsterkirbinster Registered Users Posts: 301 Major grins
edited July 22, 2011 in People
This past Monday I was taking pictures down at the shore, and just could not resist these four woman:
5959708458_a5c4594a5c_b_d.jpg

5959709932_edba517f43_b_d.jpg

5959721288_490e24654a_b_d.jpg

5955813709_dbb0fd0e00_b_d.jpg
Nikon D700, D300, D5000 , Nikon 85mm f/1.8, 28-300 AF-S VRII, 70-300AF-S VR, 70-200 AF-S VR f/2.8, 10.5mm Fisheye, Sigma 12-24mm, Nikon 24-70 f/2.8, 2 SB-600 Speedlights Manfrotto 190MF3 tripod & 322RC2 ball grip head. - NJ, USA
Flickr Photobucket

Comments

  • tropicotropico Registered Users Posts: 225 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2011
    Did they know that you were shooting them and was going to add them to this site?
    http://www.monicagarrett.com

    Canon 5D MARK II, Canon EOS 450D
    Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L, Canon 18-55mm
    Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 75-300mm, Tokina 10-24mm, Sigma 18-200mm
  • jpcjpc Registered Users Posts: 840 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2011
    A little "stalker-ish" IMO..
    http://www.jpcirre.com

    please visit: www.babyelephants.net
  • kirbinsterkirbinster Registered Users Posts: 301 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2011
    Oh come on now, there are no faces on the two that should really be embarressed. Most of the shooting was of nature, these four just were screaming out "capture me" :)

    Full set of shots at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kirbinster/sets/72157627236165412/
    Nikon D700, D300, D5000 , Nikon 85mm f/1.8, 28-300 AF-S VRII, 70-300AF-S VR, 70-200 AF-S VR f/2.8, 10.5mm Fisheye, Sigma 12-24mm, Nikon 24-70 f/2.8, 2 SB-600 Speedlights Manfrotto 190MF3 tripod & 322RC2 ball grip head. - NJ, USA
    Flickr Photobucket
  • FoquesFoques Registered Users Posts: 1,951 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2011
    this belongs elsewhere, imho...
    Arseny - the too honest guy.
    My Site
    My Facebook
  • tropicotropico Registered Users Posts: 225 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2011
    I would not like if someone took a photo of my fat-ass and post it online without my permission, even if my face didn't show. Maybe I am just a little touchy...... Laughing.gif
    http://www.monicagarrett.com

    Canon 5D MARK II, Canon EOS 450D
    Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L, Canon 18-55mm
    Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 75-300mm, Tokina 10-24mm, Sigma 18-200mm
  • kirbinsterkirbinster Registered Users Posts: 301 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2011
    Tropico then you should not go outside with "your fat-ass" as when you are out in public it is there for the world to see and capture without your permission. Don't mean to be nasty about this, but the only time you need permission is if you are using the photo for commercial purposes.
    Nikon D700, D300, D5000 , Nikon 85mm f/1.8, 28-300 AF-S VRII, 70-300AF-S VR, 70-200 AF-S VR f/2.8, 10.5mm Fisheye, Sigma 12-24mm, Nikon 24-70 f/2.8, 2 SB-600 Speedlights Manfrotto 190MF3 tripod & 322RC2 ball grip head. - NJ, USA
    Flickr Photobucket
  • QarikQarik Registered Users Posts: 4,959 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2011
    photos are interesting and totoally appropriate in my book
    D700, D600
    14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
    85 and 50 1.4
    45 PC and sb910 x2
    http://www.danielkimphotography.com
  • jonh68jonh68 Registered Users Posts: 2,711 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2011
    kirbinster wrote: »
    Tropico then you should not go outside with "your fat-ass" as when you are out in public it is there for the world to see and capture without your permission. Don't mean to be nasty about this, but the only time you need permission is if you are using the photo for commercial purposes.

    Yep, these are taken in a public place. IF you don't want to be seen, don't go out in public in a way you don't want others to see you.
    www.jonimages.com
  • anonymouscubananonymouscuban Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 4,586 Major grins
    edited July 21, 2011
    Perfectly appropriate for this forum.
    "I'm not yelling. I'm Cuban. That's how we talk."

    Moderator of the People and Go Figure forums

    My Smug Site
  • ToshidoToshido Registered Users Posts: 759 Major grins
    edited July 22, 2011
    I get the first three and especially the first two are interesting subjects. I think the third is simply a pregnant lady in bikini holding a camera. Nothing too outstanding about that one unless you are mystified or in awe of pregnancies. Me I have been through two of them with my wife and I am not really wowed by a plain pic of a pregnant woman.


    I keep looking at the fourth picture, being careful not to look too long with my afore mentioned wife sitting next to me, and I really don't understand why you were drawn to post that picture here.

    It is with regards to that last picture I understand the remarks of the photos being a little stalker-ish.

    Would really appreciate an explanation of why you like the fourth one to the point of sharing it here. I just keep going back to it thinking I am missing something beyond the obvious.
    http://www.tag-photos.smugmug.com
  • Alex81Alex81 Registered Users Posts: 23 Big grins
    edited July 22, 2011
    I think the first one is a good pic, and the fact that the girl is showing her crack is an anecdote that brings a smirk to the viewer. But there's a lot in the photo that grabs your attention so obviously it's worth posting.

    #2 and #3 seem average and not different from pics average Joe takes on holidays.

    #4 is just a bad picture. Well exposed and focused is all I can say good about it.
  • briandelionbriandelion Registered Users Posts: 512 Major grins
    edited July 22, 2011
    15524779-Ti.gif
    "Photography is not about the thing photographed.
    It is about how that thing looks photographed." Garry Winogrand

    Avatar credit: photograph by Duane Michals- picture of me, 'Smash Palace' album
  • CyberSteakCyberSteak Registered Users Posts: 280 Major grins
    edited July 22, 2011
    There should have been a warning in the title for these pics. People forum should be a safe place for anyone to view the material. I had two of my children standing beside me when I opened this thread. The crack and the crotch shot should have been posted someplace else or as I stated, there should have been a NSFW in the title. Something to indicate that the material was not for everyone.
    http://www.betterphoto.com/Premium/Default.aspx?id=329340&mp=V1

    Canon 40D, 28-135mm, 50mm f/1.8, 10-22mm, 70-300, 580 EXII, ST-E2, 500D Diopter
  • HackboneHackbone Registered Users Posts: 4,027 Major grins
    edited July 22, 2011
    1 & 3 need to be viewed by the person just so they can see what they look like. ( not very well in my humble opinion ) I can see a reason for all the comments here. #2 is an idea I could be tempted to steal and change abit for a really cool portrait.
    Charles
    www.cameraone.biz
  • dbvetodbveto Registered Users Posts: 660 Major grins
    edited July 22, 2011
    I don't think they are particularly interesting, but they were not shot for me,the first one did make me chuckle a bit.
    I don't see anything wrong with them being posted here.
    And as far as "There should have been a warning in the title for these pics"
    there is nothing in these that you cannot see at almost any public Beach.
    When I saw the title "The Girls of the Jersey Shore" I expected something worse, because of the television program that I could not watch for more than 5 min.
    Dennis
    http://www.realphotoman.com/
    Work in progress
    http://www.realphotoman.net/ Zenfolio 10% off Referral Code: 1KH-5HX-5HU
  • SimpsonBrothersSimpsonBrothers Registered Users Posts: 1,079 Major grins
    edited July 22, 2011
    tropico wrote: »
    Did they know that you were shooting them and was going to add them to this site?
    I love posts like this!rolleyes1.gif
    Simpson Brothers Photography - Facebook - Twitter

    Smugger for life!

    Most Popular Photos
Sign In or Register to comment.