Please help me decide
Help! Am looking at this lens:
Nikon 105mm f/2.8D AF Micro-Nikkor Lens
But is it worth it to get the VR in this lens for twice the price?
Nikon 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor Lens
Nikon 105mm f/2.8D AF Micro-Nikkor Lens
But is it worth it to get the VR in this lens for twice the price?
Nikon 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor Lens
Kate
www.katetaylor.smugmug.com
"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." Mark Twain
www.katetaylor.smugmug.com
"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." Mark Twain
0
Comments
As a macro/close focus only lens?
As a portrait lens?
Will you be looking to use the lens for income?
Anything else regarding the use/application of the lens?
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
www.katetaylor.smugmug.com
"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." Mark Twain
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
pp
Flickr
You don't mention if you shoot FX or DX bodies, but on DX bodies the older Micro-Nikkor AF-D 105mm, f2.8 holds its own pretty well in image quality, excellent really. The newer Micro-Nikkor AF-S 105mm, f2.8G IF-ED VR is a little sharper, but not too much better.
Reviews:
http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/223-micro-nikkor-af-105mm-f28-d-review--lab-test-report
http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/224-micro-nikkor-af-s-105mm-f28g-if-ed-vr-review--test-report
In your situation I would recommend the older AF-D model just because you probably won't notice the difference in image quality and I doubt that the VR will help as much as physical support.
For some very useful information on macro technique:
http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=143373
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
www.katetaylor.smugmug.com
"You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." Mark Twain