Half Moon @ 400mm

Nikolai

I borrowed 100-400L from my boss:



Handheld:-)
Aperture: f/8.0
ISO: 1600
Focal Length: 400mm
Exposure Time: 0.0005s (1/2000)

Enjoy moonshooting!:1drink

Sandy

Wow. so close, yet so far, really nice.

Nikolai

Thanks, Sandy!

Sandy wrote:

Wow. so close, yet so far, really nice.

IS worked wonders:-)

Skippy

Ohhhh I like that one too Nikolai

Nikolai wrote:

I borrowed 100-400L from my boss:

Handheld:-)
Aperture: f/8.0
ISO: 1600
Focal Length: 400mm
Exposure Time: 0.0005s (1/2000)

Enjoy moonshooting!

Sheeeesh and held held even wow even.........gezzz I gotta try this type of shot out myself.....it's too dang cold to be out there hehehe.
Well Done.......yup I gotta try that, I really do....... Skippy (Australia)

Phil U.

I was wondering why you went with ISO1600 but then I saw that you were handheld. Stick that thing on a tripod, drop the iso and you'll have a much sharper and clearer image.

Still, nice result from what you did.

ginger_55

I like it! I shoot my moon shots with a 400, handheld, bracketed, but basically daylight settings. So you could have gone with a slower shutter speed, I think.

But I like it as is, grain does not bother me, not that I notice it there.

I shoot like 50 photos when I do it, get a few blurred shots, but basically I come out with many more than I can use. Sharp and clear.
ginger

Michael Allen

Very nice work.

rainforest1155

Looks great!
The picture looks very similar to another done by someone with a Sony DSC-F707 at the beginning of 2005 (link), but you also have to look at what teleconverter he used (link2).

Sebastian

Nikolai

Thanks Skippy!

Skippy wrote:

Sheeeesh and held held even wow even.........gezzz I gotta try this type of shot out myself.....it's too dang cold to be out there hehehe.
Well Done.......yup I gotta try that, I really do....... Skippy (Australia)

[low voice] go.. out.. and.. shoot.. DA MOON! [/low voice]:D
Cheers!

Nikolai

Phil,

Phil U. wrote:

I was wondering why you went with ISO1600 but then I saw that you were handheld. Stick that thing on a tripod, drop the iso and you'll have a much sharper and clearer image.

Still, nice result from what you did.

My very old "El very cheapo" $40 tripod cannot handle 100-400 extended without the collar ring which I don't have.:cry
But I'll give it another try tonight with lower ISO. I hope something like ISO200 f/8 and 1/400 would work with IS even at 400mm..

Thanks for your commment!

Nikolai

Thanks Ginger!

ginger_55 wrote:

I like it! I shoot my moon shots with a 400, handheld, bracketed, but basically daylight settings. So you could have gone with a slower shutter speed, I think.

But I like it as is, grain does not bother me, not that I notice it there.

I shoot like 50 photos when I do it, get a few blurred shots, but basically I come out with many more than I can use. Sharp and clear.
ginger

Hey, I'm not alone shooting the moon handheld!

Nikolai

Thanks, Mike!

Michael Allen wrote:

Very nice work.

Glad you liked it!

Nikolai

Sebastian,

rainforest1155 wrote:

Looks great!
The picture looks very similar to another done by someone with a Sony DSC-F707 at the beginning of 2005 (link), but you also have to look at what teleconverter he used (link2).

Sebastian

Wow! that's some tele extender..:-)

Nikolai

Another one from tonight
Lowered ISO, opened the aperture. Should be less noisy:



Canon 20D, 100-400L IS, full manual, RAW, handheld.
Aperture: f/5.6
ISO: 200
Focal Length: 400mm
Exposure Time: 0.002s (1/500)
A bit of post in CS2.

Is this one better?

gluwater

The new shot is much better Nik. The noise is gone and the color is much better. It could be a bit sharper though, but for hand held it is pretty darn good.

rainforest1155

I like the old one much better. It's so incredibly sharp and I like the grainy texture produced by the high ISO. Makes me feel the moon either falling on earth or I'm on my way to the moon.

Sebastian