Horse
Azzaro
Registered Users Posts: 5,643 Major grins
He was munching on the tree:D
THANKS FOR LOOKING C&C ALWAYS WELCOME
THANKS FOR LOOKING C&C ALWAYS WELCOME
0
Comments
Love the light (as usual) in this picture!
http://www.imagesbyceci.com
http://www.facebook.com/ImagesByCeci
Picadilly, NB, Canada
http://nathanwiley.smugmug.com/
Tom
THANKS FOR THE NICE COMMENT ......I was standing on the ground, and the picture was taken looking up at the horse......He had his head twisted, and it made for and optical illusion ....:Dgary
THANKS......Glad you liked it......:D I'm surprised myself.....I didn't think there was a horse pic. left either.......
Thanks for looking, Tom.....glad you liked it.
THANKS DARREN.........:Dgary
www.Dogdotsphotography.com
THANKS MARY k.........:D
Lauren Blackwell
www.redleashphoto.com
I might hang this one:D THANKS FOR THE KIND COMMENT......:Dgary
Somebody has to be Piers Morgan here and stop the platitudes and call this what it is...
A not so flattering candid-shot of a dang horse.
I'm not going to be apologetic for being straight with you, someone has to.
I am certain you have some great horse shots... this just isn't one of them.
To our friends out here who read this;
I think when someone asks his peers for C & C, it is incumbent upon us to
be candid... no pun intended. I look at this forum as a test-bed and a place
where we can accumulate valuable input from our colleagues.
It is my hope my comments are received with the good intentions intended.
Cowboydoug
Certified Journeyman Commercial Photographer
www.iWasThereToo.com
Lauren
Lauren Blackwell
www.redleashphoto.com
Feel just a wee bit silly saying that on account I've seen enough images with horses in them from you that it
should have been quite clear sometime ago, but there it is.
Its like this one image cleared things up for me when I didn't even have a question.
If you use the book title "For The Love of Horses" would you kindly mention the assist?
Outstanding image Gary A regular cherry in your tree of cherries.
THANKS Michael........:Dgary
Candid-shot unposed photos, often taken without the subjects knowledge...... I don't shoot posed pictures of horses, dogs or coyotes. Everything I shoot is a picture of opportunity....I like to catch them doing what they do, even if it is eating on a tree. My work may not be of interest to you....I do thank you for dropping in and commenting..........:Dgary
Well done Gary, love the colours as well
.DAVID.
Take nothing but pictures. Leave nothing but footprints
Gary,
This thread has caused me a certain amount of consternation since yesterday.
So at the risk of sticking my preverbal foot in my mouth I have an addition to make.
First let me say; your work is of interest to me and I had reviewed
many of your images before writing in this thread. In fact, it was
because so many of your images were stellar, that I wrote.
Look, I thought you were interested in some honest C & C and didn't feel
you were getting it. I still feel I am right. It was NOT my intension to
insult you or any other for that matter with my remarks. I guess I
thought I made that clear... All the wonderful's just aggravated me.
And yes, I understand and appreciate candid
photos but I think that a few seconds either way would have
rendered you a two eared horse. With all the great colors you have in
this image, I simply found it a huge distraction to see one ear poking out
causing me to fixate on " it " rather than the image as a whole.
In reading the comments for your image I felt and still feel my comments
were right and you were being dealt and injustice for fear of offending you.
I think others should have mentioned the one eared horse is a distraction,
albiet a wonderful image otherwise.
I suppose I'm thinking more like an editor, considering our forum, which goes
back to the C & C thing. Perhaps I need to relax more... Maybe take up golf or something:D
Thanks for hearing/reading me out and I hope we can C & C again.
Warm regards,
Cowboydoug
Certified Journeyman Commercial Photographer
www.iWasThereToo.com
1. Color harmony. The shot used ANALOGOUS COLORS leaning on the warm tones that leads to a strong contrast.
2. Diagonal movement of the main subject.
3. Good use of the rule of thirds in composition.
4. The main subject is sharper than the background.
Now, if I want to say that the image does not work for me then I need to further clarify my point. Better yet, in most cases when you are under the mentorship of a teacher or educator, usually they will point the demerits on your work and would even show you the thing that would make your image look better by editing it. Some individuals appreciate a good edit while others prefer not to let any people commenting on their work to edit it at all. Whatever the inclination of the one who posted the image, it will either help him grow more in his photographic journey or reduce it. I have found out that the DGrin family has helped me a lot by telling me straight to the point at what aspect of my shot doesn't work and why. As for Gary's horse image, it just simply works for me that well that I can only share "Well done, my friend." Just my 2 cents from a total newbie.
http://imagesbyjirobau.blogspot.com/
This statement, whether you meant it to be or not, is actually pretty offensive. You're saying that all those who commented on Gary's image were basically pandering to him. What if we actually do enjoy the image and don't have a problem with the ear? I see two ears myself and don't find it a distraction in the least. Does this mean we have poor taste or a lack of photographic skill? Personally I'm quite comfortable with what I like and don't like in an image.
http://nathanwiley.smugmug.com/
well there you have it then... :deadhorse
I guess that solves that
Cowboydoug
Certified Journeyman Commercial Photographer
www.iWasThereToo.com
Thanks David for the nice comment....glad you liked it.........gary:D
Hi Jiro..........Thanks for the nice comment about my picture......And that is a well thought out paragraph on critiquing another persons work...... I always appreciate comments about my stuff, be it positive or negative..... There isn't anything worse than the lonely " 0" as it works way to the bottom of the page....