Canon S100: mouth drooling...
Wow. Larger sensor, ISO 6400, same f/2 lens, smaller body AND built in GPS!
too bad its $429, but I can wait a bit.
http://dpreview.com/previews/canons100/
http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/15/canon-powershot-s100-sx40/
too bad its $429, but I can wait a bit.
http://dpreview.com/previews/canons100/
http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/15/canon-powershot-s100-sx40/
0
Comments
I wonder how the high ISO will perform?
Very glad to see they're keeping the series, though - I really like my s95 and am soooo glad I decided to get a decent pns!
Dimensions:
S95: 3.93 x 2.3 x 1.16 in. (10.48 cu/I)
S100: 3.9 x 2.4 x 1.1 in (10.29 cu/I)
The sensor is actually the same size as the S95 (1/1.7"), but more MP (12.5 MP versus 10 MP), which means smaller pixels which are generally associated with more noise. BUT, it's a totally new CMOS sensor versus the previous Sxx cameras that were CCD. Canon's DSLRs are of course CMOS as well, so this looks like a step in the right direction. The camera supports ISO6400, whereas the S95 supported only ISO3200. So one would infer that this sensor has better ISO performance, but we shall see.
Link to my Smugmug site
Isn't this the first camera with Digic 5? This will be interesting. Once we figure out the specs and see how much data it can handle...
are you talking about the SX100 IS from 2007?
http://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/compacts/canon_sx100is
There is also a SD100... http://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/compacts/canon_sd100
Canon has always been a pig when it comes to camera names.. I mean Rebel? Kiss Digital?
* I see now Canon is employing a CMOS instead of a CCD sensor. Usually that means lower noise but more expensive build. So coupled with Digic V, I can understand how the noise level could drop significantly.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
Does a 2MP camera from 2000 really get you confused with this S100?
Gotta believe at sometime they need to recycle these numbers, otherwise we will be using S10000 someday. And they have roped themselves in between the high end 1D, and midrange 10D (old). So they have a 5D and 7D, only things left are 2,3,4,6,7,8,9Ds. Is a 2D better than a 5D?
"You see, the S95 is almost universially loved for its impressive low light ability and great f2.0 lens. However, battery life is poor and the video capture is limited to 720p."
Have I just been really lucky with mine? I can easily get a day of snapshot/travel shooting out of a single charge. I bought a 2nd battery at the time of purchase simply so I'd have "one to wash and one to wear" - and I am glad to have two batteries when needed - but it's never something I've found to be a problem.
Anybody else had issues with it? Just curious.
Never had an issue at all with mine and I shoot pics during bike tours that often end up in the 300 to 400 shots range in a day. I've loved mine and have had no issues at all.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Nope, sorry.
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2396223,00.asp
Bottom line: They were impressed with image sharpness and the high-ISO capabilities are on par or a little better compared to similar competing cameras.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
From the page:
"Bottom Line
The Canon PowerShot S100 is a worthy successor to our previous Editors' Choice high-end point-and-shoot camera, the PowerShot S95. It adds a longer zoom lens and GPS, and improves on the S95's image quality and performance."
It works for me in both Chrome and FF.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
I didn't know there was another choice of colors other than the black.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
Yep, I'm seeing the Canon Powershot S100 (the current version) as available in either black or silver. Now if it was from Pentax we would probably see even more color choices.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums