Help to a newbie plz

ctb04ctb04 Registered Users Posts: 3 Beginner grinner
edited November 6, 2011 in Accessories
hello all! this is my very first post here at dgrin but have been part of smugmug for quite some time.. i need a little bit of help..i have a rebel xsi with the standard kit lens and for a couple of yrs have been taking shots with it..however..i am now going into portrait and wedding photography.i have tried to do so much research and what lens i should get but i am overwhelmed with all the reading i have done..it also hasnt helped me much lol..so what lens do you guys suggest? i appreciate all and any input...thanks!

Comments

  • idiotabroadidiotabroad Registered Users Posts: 246 Major grins
    edited October 20, 2011
    I suggest you read over all the threads on weddings. And by looking at other photos that have been posted to get an idea of your skill level to many others. Then as for the lens which is at the bottom of your list of worries right now is get anything that's 2.8 for speed. Someone should post a comment on where to begin with your long journey. GL
    Mark

    If you don't agree with me then your wrong.
    I can't be held accountable for what I say, I'm bipolar.
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited October 20, 2011
    For portraiture you potentially need several lenses, depending on the type of portraiture.
    For head-and-shoulders and head shots I suggest the EF 85mm, f1.2L USM or EF 85mm, f1.8.

    For 3/4 length and full length 1 and 2 shots I suggest the EF 50mm, f1.4 USM.

    For smaller spaces and for groups I suggest the EF-S 17-55mm, f2.8 IS USM although the EF 35mm, 1.4L USM might yield much better bokeh, depending on the distance to background.

    For wedding work a standard zoom, like the EF-S 17-55mm, f2.8 IS USM is common for most shots (getting ready, processional and recessional). I also like to have a fast prime, either the EF 50mm, f1.4 USM or EF 135mm, f2L USM, depending on the venue, for shooting the ceremony when you cannot use a flash. Then I use the standard zoom for the reception as well as a 70-200mm zoom for larger reception halls, generally the EF 70-200mm, f2.8L USM.
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • idiotabroadidiotabroad Registered Users Posts: 246 Major grins
    edited October 20, 2011
    Forgive Ziggy. He did in fact answer your question, but that's thousands of dollars of lenes he listed. I guess my point was that's it's hard to get into and reallgy y hard if your already "overwhelmed" by the information you have recieved. Great job as always Ziggy on the answer, the god of all that is camera. lol
    Mark

    If you don't agree with me then your wrong.
    I can't be held accountable for what I say, I'm bipolar.
  • rpcrowerpcrowe Registered Users Posts: 733 Major grins
    edited October 21, 2011
    Double Ziggy's answer
    Attempting to cover a wedding with a single camera/lens or ny piece of important equipment is asking for disaster.

    Redundancy is the name of the game in any type of paid photography. "My camera-lens-flash-battery-memory card failed" is no excuse! You need a backup for each piece of equipment you are using. That is a backup copy of each camera, each lens, your flash, your battery, your memory cards (heck have several extra batteries and cards).

    "MURPHY'S LAW OF PHOTOGRAPHY...
    The possibility of a piece of equipment failing is in a direct relationship to the importance of the shoot and in a reverse relationship to the availability of back-up gear!"
  • paddler4paddler4 Registered Users Posts: 976 Major grins
    edited October 22, 2011
    An unsolicited suggestion: before you go into wedding photography, ask if you can shoot as a second photographer for free a few times, so that no none is relying on you. Or ask if you can shadow a pro. I shot only one, years ago, and I will never do it again. the equipment, as daunting as it is, is the easy part, IMHO. You have to be able to move very fast, knowing what DOF you want, how to position yourself to get the right backgrounds, how to handle all sorts of undesirable lighting situations, etc. And you need to do all this knowing that people are relying on you. It's not for the inexperienced or for the faint of heart.

    I recently went to a wedding shot at a beautiful site on the VT side of Lake Champlain. The wedding was outdoors, in the afternoon, with the lake as a background. Beautiful, but that meant that the backlighting was very bright, and the backgrounds would likely be blown out if you shot straight on from too great a distance for flash. I was distracted by the thought: If I were taking the pictures, would I figure out how to handle this quickly enough? Would I have thought of it in advance? The answer to both questions was "no." fortunately, the photographer was much better at this than me.

    Portraits are different: you have time to think, and you can tell the subjects were to sit, etc.
  • monk3006monk3006 Registered Users Posts: 3 Beginner grinner
    edited November 1, 2011
    I also joined dgrinner recently. I've read it for quite a while now and it's very interesting reading this threats. I have a question to ask, some advise... I currently shoot with a Canon 60D, and at this moment I'm a Jack of all trades. I do some sport, like rugby. I do weddings, portraits, functions etc, as a part time job. Most of them I do for a very low price because i enjoy my hobbie. I have a 70-300 canon IS USM lens i use for the sport, a 18-55 non IS kit lens im wanting to replace and a 50mm f/1.8 canon lens. The 18-55 doesn't match my critearia as i need a better focal range and a better IQ if possible. Im still a student so my buget is a problem. What would you (experienced) guys suggest as a good option? I'd love to go for the 24-105 L series lens, but I cant afford it at this moment as i just bought the new body and the 70-300 and 50mm lens. The 18-55 was a gift.
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited November 1, 2011
    monk3006 wrote: »
    I also joined dgrinner recently. I've read it for quite a while now and it's very interesting reading this threats. I have a question to ask, some advise... I currently shoot with a Canon 60D, and at this moment I'm a Jack of all trades. I do some sport, like rugby. I do weddings, portraits, functions etc, as a part time job. Most of them I do for a very low price because i enjoy my hobbie. I have a 70-300 canon IS USM lens i use for the sport, a 18-55 non IS kit lens im wanting to replace and a 50mm f/1.8 canon lens. The 18-55 doesn't match my critearia as i need a better focal range and a better IQ if possible. Im still a student so my buget is a problem. What would you (experienced) guys suggest as a good option? I'd love to go for the 24-105 L series lens, but I cant afford it at this moment as i just bought the new body and the 70-300 and 50mm lens. The 18-55 was a gift.

    A very good standard zoom for your camera is the Tamron SP 17-50mm, f2.8 XR Di II LD IF. It's capable of professional results if you use proper techniques. Here is a very good review of that lens:

    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tamron-17-50mm-f-2.8-XR-Di-II-Lens-Review.aspx

    Do use an external flash and a flash modifier. A flash and appropriate modifier is more important than either lens or body in that a very good lens and body without flash can still give poor results. A good external flash with a cheap lens and body can give very nice results.

    The following are all with a Canon XT/350D (ages older than your 60D and very cheap now) and a relatively cheap lens, but with good technique, external flash and an appropriate flash modifier:

    962263171_H4w8q-O.jpg

    912822732_rdkDH-O.jpg

    488158135_nKqPt-O.jpg

    143666541_gRvQT-O.jpg
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • ThatCanonGuyThatCanonGuy Registered Users Posts: 1,778 Major grins
    edited November 1, 2011
    What others have said... you'll need experience, a backup of all your gear, and a few of the lenses Ziggy mentioned. I agree with the suggestion to be a 2nd shooter as you're starting out.
    wrote:
    I also joined dgrinner recently. I've read it for quite a while now and it's very interesting reading this threats. I have a question to ask, some advise... I currently shoot with a Canon 60D, and at this moment I'm a Jack of all trades. I do some sport, like rugby. I do weddings, portraits, functions etc, as a part time job. Most of them I do for a very low price because i enjoy my hobbie. I have a 70-300 canon IS USM lens i use for the sport, a 18-55 non IS kit lens im wanting to replace and a 50mm f/1.8 canon lens. The 18-55 doesn't match my critearia as i need a better focal range and a better IQ if possible. Im still a student so my buget is a problem. What would you (experienced) guys suggest as a good option? I'd love to go for the 24-105 L series lens, but I cant afford it at this moment as i just bought the new body and the 70-300 and 50mm lens. The 18-55 was a gift.

    The best option would probably be a 17-55, but if you can't afford the 24-105, that means you can't afford the 17-55 either :D. A slightly cheaper option is the 17-40 f4L. Some other good options are the 15-85, 28-80L (discontinued, but available used), or the cheaper 28-80 USM and 24-85 USM. Personally, that focal length range (18-55, thereabouts) isn't a range I use that often, so I got the 28-105 USM lens. It's cheap, not as high-quality as the L lenses, but it works when I need it to. It's $100, it could be an option if you don't use that focal length much. I don't recommend it as a go-to lens, especially if you do a lot of weddings or portraits.
  • monk3006monk3006 Registered Users Posts: 3 Beginner grinner
    edited November 5, 2011
    ziggy53 wrote: »
    Do use an external flash and a flash modifier. A flash and appropriate modifier is more important than either lens or body in that a very good lens and body without flash can still give poor results. A good external flash with a cheap lens and body can give very nice results.

    What do you mean by a flash modifier? I'm a little confused...
  • Art ScottArt Scott Registered Users Posts: 8,959 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2011
    monk3006 wrote: »
    ziggy53 wrote: »
    Do use an external flash and a flash modifier. A flash and appropriate modifier is more important than either lens or body in that a very good lens and body without flash can still give poor results. A good external flash with a cheap lens and body can give very nice results.

    What do you mean by a flash modifier? I'm a little confused...
    small soft box, umbrella, bounce card, scoop or anything like these: http://tinyurl.com/3v9xh3x

    also if you are shooting cheap cause it is a hobby you are truly hurting yourself and of course the other PROS in your area...if you want to shoot cheap then as suggested shoot as a 2nd shooter while learning....seriously it doesn't matter if you are new or not your work is being sought after for its artistic value, hopefully and because of your walmart pricing.....charge close the median pricing of your area, so you do not undervalue yourself and can buy the needed equipment a lot sooner.....Plus shooter for more money puts pressure on you to produce top quality products.............
    "Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website

  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,133 moderator
    edited November 5, 2011
    monk3006 wrote: »
    ziggy53 wrote: »
    Do use an external flash and a flash modifier. A flash and appropriate modifier is more important than either lens or body in that a very good lens and body without flash can still give poor results. A good external flash with a cheap lens and body can give very nice results.

    What do you mean by a flash modifier? I'm a little confused...

    The best way to explain the concept of a "flash modifier" is to show them and then show the results of using them, so that you can see the respective differences in the results.

    This link does a nice job comparing various flash modifiers (although more recent modifiers are not tested as the site hasn't been updated in a while.):

    http://www.the-meissners.org/2006-small-albums/2006-flashmod/index.html

    Two (cheap but effective) DIY modifiers that I use:

    http://www.fototime.com/inv/908195739C4C0D3

    http://abetterbouncecard.com/

    Joe Demb also makes an interesting device for sale (reasonable):

    http://www.dembflashproducts.com/flipit/
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • rpcrowerpcrowe Registered Users Posts: 733 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2011
    Here's another suggestion
    It is easy to suggest that you become a second shooter for a pro but, when I started in weddings (admittedly many years ago) pros did not want a second camera person, especially not a newbie.

    I would imagine that their reluctance to have a non-paid assistant stemmed from the idea of "Why train a future competitor on my dime?" Also, I was extremely reluctant to have a non paid assistant second camera because I did not have control over his or her behavior during the wedding as I would have over the conduct of a paid assistant. However, I would have ultimate responsibility for that conduct.

    Weddings are unique events... It is seldom that you need to satisfy more people with your photography. You, of course, should give the bride and groom what they want but, it is often the mother of the bride holding the purse strings who must also be satisfied. It is also the MOTB who will get you future business based on how she feels about the job you did.

    IMO, the purely photographic side of a wedding is fairly simple. If you don't have the capability to produce very-good to exceptional imagery ALL THE TIME.... you should not ever consider shooting weddings. The really difficult facet of wedding photography is having the capability to control the event photographically without seeming to be bossy.

    Unfortunately, weddings are very stressful situations for many brides and mother's of brides. They feel that they are stressed for time and want the event to go off exactly how they have planned. Unfortunately it seldom goes exactly as it is planned and mom and bride can become short fused.wings.gif

    The last thing that mom and bride want to consider is the photography UNTIL AFTER THE WEDDING! They will often try to hurry the photographer and or not devote enough time to allow the photographer to do a good job. Knowing how to handle these people is IMO the most important skill in wedding photography (I consider the photographic skill as a given).

    Skills like knowing how to quickly pose a group shot and how to quickly pose the post ceremony portraits are essential. The ability to direct people as you need without getting them angry or insulted is something that every wedding photographer needs to learn. If you don't have proper coverage, the fact that you had been hurried and were not able to obtain that coverage won't matter to the bride or her mother.

    Once in a lifetime events are not the proper time to learn your craft. Volunteer at various social groups, veterans organizations, etc, to shoot their events free of charge. These events are often easier for a newbie to shoot and you can learn how to manipulate people in a photographic environment.

    There is another benefit to doing this. It introduces you to some people as a photographer and may help you to get future jobs as a wedding photographer.
  • monk3006monk3006 Registered Users Posts: 3 Beginner grinner
    edited November 6, 2011
    Thanks for all the responses, it curtainly helps. I couldn't help noticing this. Some images I view is 240 or 300 Dpi, but these I take is only 72. How can that be? Is it normal or should I change it in my post processing?
  • Art ScottArt Scott Registered Users Posts: 8,959 Major grins
    edited November 6, 2011
    monk3006 wrote: »
    Thanks for all the responses, it curtainly helps. I couldn't help noticing this. Some images I view is 240 or 300 Dpi, but these I take is only 72. How can that be? Is it normal or should I change it in my post processing?

    72 DPI is the native resolution from the camera....when I run mine thru lightroom IA have it set to save all my work at 300dpi and that sets me so I am ready to do whatever I need, especially if I am need to uprez in Genuine fractals....300dpi file uprezed to a 40x60 image (or larger) at 300dpi will render a print that needs no viewing distance to look at it....where as most images need a few feet of viewing distance to look good, like a painting....some of the greatest look terrible until you step back some distance and the brush strokes and paint globs meld together to look fantastic.
    "Genuine Fractals was, is and will always be the best solution for enlarging digital photos." ....Vincent Versace ... ... COPYRIGHT YOUR WORK ONLINE ... ... My Website

  • ThatCanonGuyThatCanonGuy Registered Users Posts: 1,778 Major grins
    edited November 6, 2011
    Yeah, I use Adobe Camera Raw (in Photoshop) and save as 350 dpi or whatever.
Sign In or Register to comment.