Landscapes of Afghanistan

ADMIT PhotographyADMIT Photography Registered Users Posts: 431 Major grins
edited October 25, 2011 in Landscapes
Website: http://www.admitphotography.com
Facebook - Twitter
Nikon D200, D80, SB600, nikon 50mm 1.8, nikon 18-135 3.5-4.6, nikon 70-200

Comments

  • ADMIT PhotographyADMIT Photography Registered Users Posts: 431 Major grins
    edited October 25, 2011
    Anyone?
    Website: http://www.admitphotography.com
    Facebook - Twitter
    Nikon D200, D80, SB600, nikon 50mm 1.8, nikon 18-135 3.5-4.6, nikon 70-200
  • kdogkdog Administrators Posts: 11,681 moderator
    edited October 25, 2011
    The lighting looks pretty drab in most of them. Plus there doesn't appear to be a focal point in any of them with the exception of #3, and possibly 6 and 7, but it's hard to tell because they're posted so small. These images are tiny on my 1920x1280 monitor. I tried going to your Smuggie account directly to view them larger, but you don't allow that. Maybe my eyes are just too old, but I can barely make out any details at all in your panos. Maybe repost them larger and/or with links to view them in larger sizes.
  • squirl033squirl033 Registered Users Posts: 1,230 Major grins
    edited October 25, 2011
    you've captured a feeling of desolation and a very poor country, though i'm not sure if that was your intent. but beyond that,b there's not much there to hold my interest. i'm not a big fan of shots of distant mountains with nothing else in them.
    ~ Rocky
    "Out where the rivers like to run, I stand alone, and take back something worth remembering..."
    Three Dog Night

    www.northwestnaturalimagery.com
  • EiaEia Registered Users Posts: 3,627 Major grins
    edited October 25, 2011
    I would like to see them bigger - to at least bring out some detail in the landscape. The mountain range in #2 is beautiful. It looks like it could be a scene in the western usa. The houses sure blend in well with their landscape! Interesting!
  • ADMIT PhotographyADMIT Photography Registered Users Posts: 431 Major grins
    edited October 25, 2011
    Thanks for the comments so far. As requested I've made the photos bigger to the XL size.

    Here is a link directly to my Military gallery hosting these photos. All photos in that gallery are from my deployment. I don't know if it will work for you all or not but it's worth a shot.

    KDog: What do you suggest for the lighting? They all looked good on every monitor I've used. Are they just coming across dark to you?
    Website: http://www.admitphotography.com
    Facebook - Twitter
    Nikon D200, D80, SB600, nikon 50mm 1.8, nikon 18-135 3.5-4.6, nikon 70-200
  • kdogkdog Administrators Posts: 11,681 moderator
    edited October 25, 2011
    They do present a lot better in the larger size. The exposures look fine. By bland lighting, I mean it's flat and without any color and contrast. There's just no interest in the lighting. Good landscapes shots require more than going someplace interesting and snapping a shot. It means understand the location and making the effort to be there at a precise moment when something interesting is happening. The golden hours of one hour before sunrise and one hour after sunset make the best photos. And even then that doesn't guarantee a good picture. You're also at the mercy of what mother nature hands you that day. Very often it takes many attempts before one finally gets what they want out of a particular scene. Think of what your #6 and 7 panos would look like with dramatic skies, or maybe a sunstar peeking over one side of the mountain range.

    Here's a link to one of my own photos for illustration. It's all about the light. deal.gif

    http://www.desertilluminations.com/Landscapes/Valley-of-Fire/13199031_PvXB5B/960046185_#959997265_WU7aw-XL-LB
  • ADMIT PhotographyADMIT Photography Registered Users Posts: 431 Major grins
    edited October 25, 2011
    I see what your saying. But as luck would have it I only had limited time to shoot as I was on a job and just stopped to get this panoramic shot so I couldn't stick around for the dramatic lighting I would have liked. However I've actually printed #6 out and currently have it hanging in my office. It looks quite nice and I get nothing but complements on it. But I agree it would look allot better with a more dramatic sky.

    We're you able to get into my gallery with the link provided?
    Website: http://www.admitphotography.com
    Facebook - Twitter
    Nikon D200, D80, SB600, nikon 50mm 1.8, nikon 18-135 3.5-4.6, nikon 70-200
  • kdogkdog Administrators Posts: 11,681 moderator
    edited October 25, 2011
    I just tried the link now, and yes I can get in fine. #6 looks great at X3 and Original sizes. There's a lot of detail in that shot, nice work. It could have been better, but I do understand about time constraints. Oh boy, do I.
Sign In or Register to comment.