Fall engagement
Hey guys look or comment or whatever. First time I have ever done a person dressed in military clothes, so comments on how I handled that would be great. Basically I just did what I do and didn't change anything because of it.
01. Started ouit a little flare-happy!
02.
03.
04.
05. Too wide! Love this bridge though
06. OK... back to the flare! LOL
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
01. Started ouit a little flare-happy!
02.
03.
04.
05. Too wide! Love this bridge though
06. OK... back to the flare! LOL
07.
08.
09.
10.
11.
12.
My Smugmug site
Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
0
Comments
- #1 I don't mind the flare but in terms of composition the wall line cutting through him is catching my eye?
- I really like #2, but composition might have been even better had they been sitting on the complete right, this way the plant would have led the eye to their heads + you would've gotten more of that lovely backlight outlining their heads. Same comment for the beautiful #3.
- #4... I get the temptation to keep it, but I'd cut it, because of his expression. Maybe if he had squeezed her butt and they were both laughing forward, that would have been a stellar shot?
- #5 agreed... too wide. I love the concept however.
- #6. I love the flare, the composition is oh so close to perfect. What stops me from perfect? The line made by the tree trunk. I think it makes things go off balance. I would love to have seen them alined with the 2nd tree from the right (this is really nitpicking)
- #7 is very good even though it's kind of a tight crop
- #8 It's 99% awesome - his expression is oh so slightly off?
- #9-12 - love 'em!!
Hope that helps
4b
8b
All that aside though I appreciate your comments. It is always great to learn from another persons eyes.
Thanks gain!
Matt
Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
I really like 4b for his expression, but I might crop it only because the partial body on her is a little strange? If you cropped it at the waist though it would be really awesome
As for 8b, there is something amazing about it. I really love it above and beyond 8 - something in his eyes? I'd keep that one over 8
I'm really diggin #10 and #11 as well. These just pull it off for me. I can see the client requesting these to be blown up and hanging on the wall. Very nice!
seanealyphotography@hotmail.com
http://www.seanealy.com
http://seanealyphotography.blogspot.com
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Sean-Ealy-Photography/244381988916
They get all of them so they can pick!
Thanks again and Thanks for the kind words Sean.
Matt
Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
I really love them all comp wise (except 4-it's not quite a Hi Mom pic like 8, and not quite a candid romantic), but ...IMHO, I'd love all the vintage processed ones way more with the straight processing that you used on the beachside images. Those are the standouts in a strong set.
Bodies: Canon 5d mkII, 5d, 40d
Lenses: 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f4.0L, 135 f2L, 85 f1.8, 50 1.8, 100 f2.8 macro, Tamron 28-105 f2.8
Flash: 2x 580 exII, Canon ST-E2, 2x Pocket Wizard flexTT5, and some lower end studio strobes
My Weddings Website • Blog •