Warning: This image has been photoshopped!

AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
edited November 30, 2011 in The Big Picture
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/technology/software-to-rate-how-drastically-photos-are-retouched.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1322547643-tqKXkwqkFRYSpQOIz9VFjA



.
www.angelo.smugmug.com

Moderator of: Location, Location, Location , Mind Your Own Business & Other Cool Shots

Comments

  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited November 29, 2011
    Interesting read! thumb.gif
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited November 29, 2011
    right? I like the idea of trying to lay off the photoshop work that perpetuates the perfect physique which can negatively impact younger, impressionable readers, but labeling? headscratch.gif
    www.angelo.smugmug.com

    Moderator of: Location, Location, Location , Mind Your Own Business & Other Cool Shots
  • cookbookcookbook Registered Users Posts: 4 Beginner grinner
    edited November 30, 2011
    happy holidays to all the smuggers
  • SamSam Registered Users Posts: 7,419 Major grins
    edited November 30, 2011
    Sure, lets keep the PS reasonable, but new legislation??? Gime a break!

    OH and I like how they just plucked images from professional websites for their own use.

    Sam
    www.samlinvillephotography.com
  • RogersDARogersDA Registered Users Posts: 3,502 Major grins
    edited November 30, 2011
    Sam wrote: »
    Of and I like how they just plucked images from professional websites for there own use.
    That was my first thought, too. Maybe they asked first? Doubt it, but I guess it is still a possibility.

    Of course this also should apply to all the government propaganda photos that show missiles that weren't there, people that have been removed, etc.
    David
    GreyLeaf PhotoGraphy
Sign In or Register to comment.