Still trying... and craving C&C please

SnowgirlSnowgirl Registered Users Posts: 2,155 Major grins
edited January 8, 2012 in Holy Macro
Good morning (my time). I did a few more shots today. Everything shot with 1DMKIV on a tripod, MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5X lens, MR-14EXMacro Ring Light, ISO 100, FL 65mm.

One thing I've learned so far.. I can not get an entire nickel in the shot. Even at 1X if I want any of the text or engraving to be in focus, I lose a portion of the rim...

1. f/11 1/125 1X Camera at 90 degrees to coin which I mounted (using that poster stick-um blue goo stuff) on a sheet of white coroplast

DL2H7611-L.jpg

2. f/11 1/125 2X The detail in the beaver's fur and edge engraving is quote amazing at 2X

DL2H7613-Version-2-L.jpg

3. f/11 1/125 1/2" bell from our Christmas ornaments. I focused on the snowman's nose. Ornament is hanging by a ribbon and hook from the top of the coroplast sheet. This set of 3 shots was to see the effect of changing one element at a time - either the f/stop OR the Shutter Speed

DL2H7606-L.jpg

4. f/11 1/300

DL2H7607-L.jpg

5. f/16 1/300

DL2H7608-L.jpg

It may be my glasses (trifocals) but I don't see much difference among #3, #4 and #5. If anything, #4 seems a bit 'brighter' than the other two, to me.

Comments and suggestions gratefully accepted.:lust
Creating visual and verbal images that resonate with you.
http://www.imagesbyceci.com
http://www.facebook.com/ImagesByCeci
Picadilly, NB, Canada

Comments

  • Lord VetinariLord Vetinari Registered Users Posts: 15,901 Major grins
    edited January 8, 2012
    Nice detail showing on the coin !
    Re the other 3 shots of the ornament, Agree there doesn't seem to be much difference. You won't see much effect if any effect of shutter speed because a) I assume these were not handheld Ie they were on a tripod, and b) at shutter speeds where the main source of light is the flash (camera in manual mode), the effective shutter speed is the flash duration which is likely to be 1/1000th or faster.
    With the aperture, if you had a subject with a lot of fine detail, you may have noticed some diffraction softening of the image at F16. Diffraction effects in normal lenses can be seen around F16 vs say F8. A macro lens unfortunately is a whole lot worse because magnification plays a part so that the effective aperture = set aperture * (M+1)
    So at 1:1 mag = 1X a set aperture of f16 becomes 16X(1+1) =F32. It gets a whole lot worse at 5:1. Overall this means you have to balance off DOF which gets narrower with increasing magnification, with diffraction softening which gets worse with increasing magnification. The baalnce depends on the dof vs the detail you want to capture.
    Brian v.
  • SnowgirlSnowgirl Registered Users Posts: 2,155 Major grins
    edited January 8, 2012
    Nice detail showing on the coin !
    Re the other 3 shots of the ornament, Agree there doesn't seem to be much difference. You won't see much effect if any effect of shutter speed because a) I assume these were not handheld Ie they were on a tripod, and b) at shutter speeds where the main source of light is the flash (camera in manual mode), the effective shutter speed is the flash duration which is likely to be 1/1000th or faster.
    With the aperture, if you had a subject with a lot of fine detail, you may have noticed some diffraction softening of the image at F16. Diffraction effects in normal lenses can be seen around F16 vs say F8. A macro lens unfortunately is a whole lot worse because magnification plays a part so that the effective aperture = set aperture * (M+1)
    So at 1:1 mag = 1X a set aperture of f16 becomes 16X(1+1) =F32. It gets a whole lot worse at 5:1. Overall this means you have to balance off DOF which gets narrower with increasing magnification, with diffraction softening which gets worse with increasing magnification. The baalnce depends on the dof vs the detail you want to capture.
    Brian v.

    Thank you for that explanation. It's very helpful. My husband asked how I was enjoying my new macro kit and I said "it's challenging". He was concerned that he'd "goofed" in getting my Christmas gift. Not! I love a challenge and this is, without doubt, the most challenging genre of photography - both artistically and technically. So first, get the technical learning out of the way - then get on with the artistic side.

    Thanks again,
    Ceci
    Creating visual and verbal images that resonate with you.
    http://www.imagesbyceci.com
    http://www.facebook.com/ImagesByCeci
    Picadilly, NB, Canada
  • redleashredleash Registered Users Posts: 3,840 Major grins
    edited January 8, 2012
    Ceci - Tell Joel he definitely did not goof! I told him how well he'd done when I got a sneak peek before Christmas. :D It'll take practice and you will certainly pick up good tips from the folks in this forum . It's such a change from what you normally shoot so just have fun with it! Maybe Halo will sit still long enough for you to do an eye closeup--I know Hoover won't.

    As for these shots, I think you did a good job with focus on the nickel closeup. Excellent detail there.

    Have fun!

    Lauren
    "But ask the animals, and they will teach you." (Job 12:7)

    Lauren Blackwell
    www.redleashphoto.com
  • SnowgirlSnowgirl Registered Users Posts: 2,155 Major grins
    edited January 8, 2012
    Thanks Lauren. So much to learn. it's a totally humbling experience; but it is fun.
    Creating visual and verbal images that resonate with you.
    http://www.imagesbyceci.com
    http://www.facebook.com/ImagesByCeci
    Picadilly, NB, Canada
Sign In or Register to comment.