Thanks everyone.
I have never replaced a background on a portrait....not that I am opposed to it.
Evening light from behind and softbox from above frame left.
Thanks everyone.
I have never replaced a background on a portrait....not that I am opposed to it.
Evening light from behind and softbox from above frame left.
Haha, I am a none believer. But first of all I woud like to say that this is a great shot or shots.
I believe that this is studio work (the model) and then cutt to a back-ground. The light and DOF looks a bit odd in that respect. I can be wrong, and it does not matter anyhow it still stays a nice shot.
A photographer without a style, is like a pub without beer
Haha, I am a none believer. But first of all I woud like to say that this is a great shot or shots.
I believe that this is studio work (the model) and then cutt to a back-ground. The light and DOF looks a bit odd in that respect. I can be wrong, and it does not matter anyhow it still stays a nice shot.
zoomer is just waaaay to lazy in his post processing to do that. trust me. lol. if it takes more than 3 minutes to edit he will toss it.
Perhaps it has to do with the jpg compression, but there's something about the image that just doesn't look right to me. I suppose it could be the result of the backlighting, but my initial impression was that the model had been extracted. Well it wasn't, so what is it that's bugging me? Look at the triangle between her legs and the edge of her jeans on her left (CR) leg. Maybe it's just way oversharpened. Do you see what I'm referring to?
John :
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
Icebear,
Do you mean that what appears to be a barely visible shadow line in the areas you mentioned....I don't see it anywhere else. No clue what that is.
If I think about it I will look at the large unshrunk down version when I get home and see if it is there.
Possibly she was slightly moving her hips as I shot.
For those of you less familiar with my work I do often take pics that have a hint of "pasted in" to them. Slightly underexposed backgrounds, ambient from behind the subject and use of off camera flash combined with extreme thin depth of field will do that.
This HAS to be fake - if you're in Idaho, where's the snow??? HUH?? It's January! you can't fool us! Nice try!
(...and I'm giving you the business, I'm in the Salt Lake area and we're the same way. We went skiing at Sundance last weekend and there's grass peaking through the snow)
Comments
www.cameraone.biz
Sorry, gotta ask. Did you replace the BG?
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
+1, this is an awesome image.
I have never replaced a background on a portrait....not that I am opposed to it.
Evening light from behind and softbox from above frame left.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
Very nicely executed! What was in the SB?
In the softbox was an sb800.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
awesome shot!
My Site
My Facebook
I believe that this is studio work (the model) and then cutt to a back-ground. The light and DOF looks a bit odd in that respect. I can be wrong, and it does not matter anyhow it still stays a nice shot.
zoomer is just waaaay to lazy in his post processing to do that. trust me. lol. if it takes more than 3 minutes to edit he will toss it.
14-24 24-70 70-200mm (vr2)
85 and 50 1.4
45 PC and sb910 x2
http://www.danielkimphotography.com
You know me to well.
Thanks
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
Great shot, Zooms. I'm not crazy about her hair and makeup (personal taste), but it's photographically stunning!
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
Do you mean that what appears to be a barely visible shadow line in the areas you mentioned....I don't see it anywhere else. No clue what that is.
If I think about it I will look at the large unshrunk down version when I get home and see if it is there.
Possibly she was slightly moving her hips as I shot.
For those of you less familiar with my work I do often take pics that have a hint of "pasted in" to them. Slightly underexposed backgrounds, ambient from behind the subject and use of off camera flash combined with extreme thin depth of field will do that.
Link to more portrait examples: http://alloutdoor.smugmug.com/Portrait-galleries/Senior-Pictures-and-Portraits/3557395_3tZ2C4#!i=958231330&k=rNdx6
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
(...and I'm giving you the business, I'm in the Salt Lake area and we're the same way. We went skiing at Sundance last weekend and there's grass peaking through the snow)
PPG • Flickr • Wikimedia Commons
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
Facebook: Friend / Fan || Twitter: @shimamizu || Google Plus
Canon 600D; Canon 1D Mk2;
24-105 f4L IS; 70-200 f4L IS; 50mm 1.4; 28-75 f2.8; 55-250 IS; 580EX & (2) 430EX Flash,
Model Galleries: http://bilsen.zenfolio.com/
Everything Else: www.pbase.com/bilsen