FujiFilm - HS30EXR or X-S1?
Photog4Christ
Registered Users Posts: 716 Major grins
I currently have a D200 and I am looking at moving to either the HS30EXR or the X-S1. I know some of you are going to ask why move from a dSLR to a "Bridge Camera", but that is not a topic for this thread.
I did own a S100FS and it was a great camera. It just didn't suite my needs at the time, so I sold it.
Here are some concert photos taken with the S100FS:
Link to photos
So, my question is. Will I be okay with the HS30EXR for $499 (MSRP), or am I going to really kick myself and wish that I had spent another $300 for the X-S1?
Is the X-S1 really going to be worth $799??
I already have a pocket P & S (Panasonic TZ5).
I would use the other camera (HS30 or X-S1) for mainly landscape, scenics, etc... If I had a family gathering (example: birthday party) I would probably go for the P & S. If I wanted an impromptu grab, I would just use my Razr.
I haven't shot a concert in a few years, but I really like the Manual mode of the bridge camera vs. the P & S.
Thank you
Neal
I did own a S100FS and it was a great camera. It just didn't suite my needs at the time, so I sold it.
Here are some concert photos taken with the S100FS:
Link to photos
So, my question is. Will I be okay with the HS30EXR for $499 (MSRP), or am I going to really kick myself and wish that I had spent another $300 for the X-S1?
Is the X-S1 really going to be worth $799??
I already have a pocket P & S (Panasonic TZ5).
I would use the other camera (HS30 or X-S1) for mainly landscape, scenics, etc... If I had a family gathering (example: birthday party) I would probably go for the P & S. If I wanted an impromptu grab, I would just use my Razr.
I haven't shot a concert in a few years, but I really like the Manual mode of the bridge camera vs. the P & S.
Thank you
Neal
<><
Neal Jacob
[URL="http://nealjacob.com/twitter"]Twitter[/URL]|[B][URL="http://photos.nealjacob.com"]SmugMug[/URL][/B
Neal Jacob
[URL="http://nealjacob.com/twitter"]Twitter[/URL]|[B][URL="http://photos.nealjacob.com"]SmugMug[/URL][/B
0
Comments
If anything, my recommendation is to upgrade your dSLR and lenses for really great image acquisition, and then hone your post-processing techniques for the very best results. Compared to your D200, for example, the Nikon D7000 gives much more pleasing results in general, with regard to that "smoothness" factor. Compared with a P&S or even most digicams, the D7000 will beat them at base ISO (although it is more subtle), and there is no comparison at high-ISOs where the D7000 is just exemplary.
You can use the Imaging Resource "Comparometer" to see for yourself.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
-- Sent from my TouchPad using Communities
Neal Jacob
[URL="http://nealjacob.com/twitter"]Twitter[/URL]|[B][URL="http://photos.nealjacob.com"]SmugMug[/URL][/B
The camera is a viewfinder style and the lens is not as wide as some would like, but the lens may prove to be very high quality with fewer aberrations than the HS30EXR or X-S1, just because it has a shorter zoom ratio along with high quality glass.
(Most of the above is conjecture because very little is known about this camera.)
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
I've also considered the following: Canon PowerShot SX40 HS, Panasonic FZ150K, and the Nikon COOLPIX P500.
What's really attracting me to the FujiFilm:
"SLR-like" (focal length, manual focus on the barrel)
Filter threads
P, A, S, M shooting modes
Neal Jacob
[URL="http://nealjacob.com/twitter"]Twitter[/URL]|[B][URL="http://photos.nealjacob.com"]SmugMug[/URL][/B