What happening with the new way of referencing photos/galleries?

pgman

Hi,

I thought that we are supposed to get the new/fancy/improved links/addresses. I tried:

http://photos.foto-biz.com/People/Photographers/16543273_GHCzXW#!i=1666812057&k=mFvkN5m

with the new... but when I go to share > get a link > photo links > large, I get:

http://photos.foto-biz.com/People/Photographers/i-mFvkN5m/0/L/snowy-owls-20111231-1513-L.jpg

Obviously either I didn't understand or I'm missing something. Can somebody explain it to me?

Andy

What's the problem, I'm not understanding? The gallery link url is different than an direct photo link url, and is intended to be that way.

pgman

Andy wrote: »

What's the problem, I'm not understanding? The gallery link url is different than an direct photo link url, and is intended to be that way.

I'm just trying to understand. That's all. I didn't understand that from the blog post.

Andy

pgman wrote: »

I'm just trying to understand. That's all. I didn't understand that from the blog post.

OK, cool. Gallery links changed (with the hash bangs) and photo links did not change.