Untitled (rust-free)

Cornflake

No religious editorial is intended.

TonyCooper

That's an odd statue. Whatever the artist was trying to portray doesn't
come across. Jesus as heartless?

The photo itself is a bit odd. Either infrared or sadly lacking in contrast.
I've never been a big fan of infared, but I know others like it.

Cornflake

Thanks for the comment, Tony. It didn't occur to me that others might react to the statue that way or I probably wouldn't have posted it, as I wasn't after controversy. My apologies if anyone's offended by it.

The image isn't infrared, but it's certainly not high-contrast.

TonyCooper

Cornflake wrote: »

Thanks for the comment, Tony. It didn't occur to me that others might react to the statue that way or I probably wouldn't have posted it, as I wasn't after controversy. My apologies if anyone's offended by it.

The image isn't infrared, but it's certainly not high-contrast.

And I, in turn, apologize if you took my comment to mean that I was
offended by the photo or the artist's work. I don't find either offensive
or controversial.

There's lot of artwork about where I really don't understand what
the artist was trying to convey. This is one of them. He or she
probably had something in mind, but it doesn't come across to me.

Dogdots

I like it .. you did a very good job on the editing

Cornflake

Thanks, Mary.

ghinson

My first thought looking at this is that it looks so much like the statue-Jesus is holding a camera in his right hand that I want to Photoshop one in there after reshooting the scene wider with a couple pretending to pose in front of him...

Earache

ghinson wrote: »

My first thought looking at this is that it looks so much like the statue-Jesus is holding a camera in his right hand that I want to Photoshop one in there after reshooting the scene wider with a couple pretending to pose in front of him...

thumb But now the question is: WWJD? - Point and Shoot or DSLR?

Please excuse the irreverent humor.