Electric model planes
All the rage it appears here now. At least they are quiet. I had never seen them before. One charge lasts about 15 mins.
I was coming home from birding & thought..this is good training with a lens.
Says it all i recon
He was checking this one out prior to take off. It can do 180 KPH (110mph) he told me & i recon he was on the money watching it....no way could i follow it with a lens...i could only just watch it with my eyes it was so fast.
The only time i could get it properly was on landing
I was coming home from birding & thought..this is good training with a lens.
Says it all i recon
He was checking this one out prior to take off. It can do 180 KPH (110mph) he told me & i recon he was on the money watching it....no way could i follow it with a lens...i could only just watch it with my eyes it was so fast.
The only time i could get it properly was on landing
0
Comments
Setup: One camera, one lens, and one roll of film.
Great shots though Gus. I like #3 best...
www.photographyontheside.com [My blog about creating a part-time photography business]
Create A Gorgeous Photography Website with Smugmug in 90 Minutes [My free course if you need help setting up and customizing your SmugMug site]
Having the propellor in the back helps you a bunch because you don't have to worry much about shutter speed. Number four is the best because of a touch of prop blur. Most the shots from the front you can't see the prop so it doesn't matter. The profile shot with the prop frozen, however, doesn't come out as good.
Planes can be hard to shoot because that propellor spins slower than you think it does! So you often get a shutter speed far below the 1/focal length rule of thumb, like 1/160 on a 300mm lens.
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
Yes I did a double-take too at the Swastika, it's prolly an age thing, and I'm definitely not on top of it reaction-wise. (But love Snoopy and the Red Baron).
http://www.sherbrookephotography.smugmug.com
I asked & its about $1000 to start flying & the planes are almost indestructable...they are made from a high density foam & can take a full speed ground hit without worry. If they do get damaged they just tap them up with some duct tape.
Looks like alot of fun, but the last thing I need now is another expensive hobbyPhotography and fishkeeping do a pretty good job of making sure my money is spent.
Art washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life...Picasso
Now the Spitfire, there is an aircraft!!
I'll have to see if there are any of these local to us, the noise of flying models has always been an offput, plus their fragility. If these are also built 'strong' it gives them a double advantage as a model hobby.
Rahmonster, you're right about the cost of hobbies, we mess a bit with model railways, which Paul won't let me call trainsets for some obscure elitist reason.
We could fly a model tigermoth and a huge tank of tropicals for our little shedfull of steam engines.
http://www.sherbrookephotography.smugmug.com