Cute couple.
This is an engagement shoot I did last week. Handsome couple they were pretty easy after the first 15 minutes or so and they relaxed.
All natural light with the d3 and the 85 1.4.
Their full gallery is here: http://alloutdoor.smugmug.com/Engagement-galleries/Lacy-and-Brian/21341201_BLRBD9#!i=1699757273&k=n7DDSpn
1
2
3
4
5
6
All natural light with the d3 and the 85 1.4.
Their full gallery is here: http://alloutdoor.smugmug.com/Engagement-galleries/Lacy-and-Brian/21341201_BLRBD9#!i=1699757273&k=n7DDSpn
1
2
3
4
5
6
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
0
Comments
Btw, John Galt, This shot is a textbook example of what I've meant by a shallow depth of field shot that still manages to provide context and texture
Only slightly negative input I could give is that in Number Two, I would have preferred bare feet as opposed to the bottom of her shoes.
Nice images... I really like your set overall... nice job... great location... Don't you just love the 85mm lens?
A couple of thoughts... I'm not a real fan of CLUB hands...
In #1 ... Her clutching hand just drives me nuttso... In the future maybe you can keep an eye on this and go for more relaxed or even move her hand up towards his elbow... hands can really make or break a great portrait.
In 3... "I want to drink your blood"... and she says... yeah, okay... go ahead... I've never been a fan of this shot... (that's just me... however, your execution is wonderful)
#4 This is the only image she looks chunky in... horizontal stripes can be a killer... This is a perfect case of how they can extend a body... The hand... again... ...I would have moved her hand down to the seams on his shoulder... Love the high-key... Super deluxe...
#5... I think they needed a little more eyeball ...
*** #6... Perfect... Simply a great portrait... bravo... I of course don't know this couple but I can tell you nailed them here... ring hand & all
Do you play with curves at all in photoshop? I think I would have clicked on his face & warmed that up just a smidgen or 2... 3:) Also in PS... I might have desaturated the red on her wrist in this last shot... It's certainly not a deal breaker but I think it would help from sucking your eyeballs right into it...
Just my 3 cents worth:) thanks for sharing...
Cowboydoug
Certified Journeyman Commercial Photographer
www.iWasThereToo.com
Yes the 1.4 is nice for portraits. I always wrestle with using the 70-200 at high mm or using the 85.
They are using the bottom photo announcement.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
Link to my Smugmug site
There were really nervous when we first showed up this was about the 5th shot we took. I told them to pretend they snuck off from a tour for a quick makeout session....they were just kinda getting going and I said really loud "hey what are you two doing back here" this is the look I got for number 1.
We had a good laugh then and the tension went away pretty quickly after that...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
http://www.scotthofferphotography.com
www.CottageInk.smugmug.com
NIKON D700
That farm shoot is still one of my favorites.
Yes the 85 makes portraits so much easier, appreciate your comments.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21695902@N06/
http://500px.com/Shockey
alloutdoor.smugmug.com
http://aoboudoirboise.smugmug.com/
Who is wise? He who learns from everyone.
My SmugMug Site
www.cameraone.biz