Playing with VSCO... CnC please.

mjoshi123mjoshi123 Registered Users Posts: 216 Major grins
edited April 6, 2012 in Weddings
Here are few pics that I tried my hand at after getting VSCO films yesterday. I got the standard package but I think this one does pretty neat job. This set is from my very first wedding as a second shooter.
CnC please.

FirstWedding110827IMG3808-Edit-XL.jpg

FirstWedding110827IMG3854-Edit-XL.jpg

FirstWedding110827IMG3880-Edit-XL.jpg

FirstWedding110827IMG3867-Edit-XL.jpg

FirstWedding110827IMG3803-Edit-XL.jpg

FirstWedding110827IMG3861-Edit-XL.jpg

FirstWedding110827IMG3833-Edit-XL.jpg

Comments

  • KinkajouKinkajou Registered Users Posts: 1,240 Major grins
    edited February 22, 2012
    First - congrats on getting them!

    Second - can you do some side-by-side before and afters?
    Webpage

    Spread the love! Go comment on something!
  • mjoshi123mjoshi123 Registered Users Posts: 216 Major grins
    edited February 22, 2012
    Kinkajou wrote: »
    First - congrats on getting them!

    Second - can you do some side-by-side before and afters?

    sure I'll give it a try soon
  • Matthew SavilleMatthew Saville Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 3,352 Major grins
    edited February 22, 2012
    Looking great, although I'd probably prefer to reduce the opacity of ALL the images' filtering by 20-30%. Just looks a bit much. It might be caused by the fact that all of the people images have shadowed eyes; and the images are all a little dark in general. But I'm liking the looks in general!

    =Matt=
    “My first thought is always of light.” – Galen Rowell
    My SmugMug Portfolio • My Astro-Landscape Photo Blog • Dgrin Weddings Forum
  • mjoshi123mjoshi123 Registered Users Posts: 216 Major grins
    edited February 22, 2012
    Matthew Saville wrote: »
    Looking great, although I'd probably prefer to reduce the opacity of ALL the images' filtering by 20-30%. Just looks a bit much. It might be caused by the fact that all of the people images have shadowed eyes; and the images are all a little dark in general. But I'm liking the looks in general!

    =Matt=

    Thanks Matt,

    Here is one for sidebyside comparison.
    here is original from camera
    i-G5rRQz3-XL.jpg

    This is one converted in VSCO
    i-bDQQMSp-XL.jpg

    here is one converted using Camerabag2
    Style-1962
    i-R5DNRTx-XL.jpg

    Style-Matte
    i-pC2Sz2k-XL.jpg

    Style-1974
    i-sLTh4zT-XL.jpg
  • mjoshi123mjoshi123 Registered Users Posts: 216 Major grins
    edited February 23, 2012
    One more thing if you are interested in getting Camerabag 2 it is available thru Apple App Store for $19 which is cheaper than VSCO films. Camerabag2 is standalone application but you should be able to launch it from LR3 just like any other application and return your result back into LR3.
  • joshtiltonjoshtilton Registered Users Posts: 6 Beginner grinner
    edited February 23, 2012
    VSCO responds the best to properly exposed images with perfect white balance. The main benefit of VSCO is to achieve better skin tones. With great exposure and wb to start your skin tones should be great anyway- VSCO enhances them to emulate the look of film.

    I would spend more time with your raw processing to fix the underexposure of your images and the white balance issues. You'll see a huge difference to how a VSCO preset responds after that :)
  • avangardphotoavangardphoto Registered Users Posts: 66 Big grins
    edited April 6, 2012
    You have to make a perfect exposure to get the best results from VSCO.
    Avangard Photography | Toronto Wedding Photography Studio
Sign In or Register to comment.