Nikon 3100 vs Canon T2i

adbsgicomadbsgicom Registered Users Posts: 3,615 Major grins
edited February 24, 2012 in Cameras
A friend is looking to go with one of these options (they are what Costco is selling). I never looked at this price point, so I'm not sure if there is substantial difference one way or the other. She has no lenses to push her one way or the other. In the film days, she says she had a rather high-end Canon and then got out of shooting for many years.

Both systems are at about $800 with an 18-55/55-250 (canon) 18-55/55-200 (nikon) lenses bag, etc. Not much to push one way or another in terms of what you get.

Looking at the basic specs, the t2i claims better ISO and a denser sensor (18MPix vs 14MPix).

Guys at snapsort give the t2i a very slight nod over the d3100, seemingly based on the MPix and max ISO. However, the D3100 scored better on noise at high ISO (thus I wonder if the higher ISO on the t2i is really usable), having autofocus that works during video, a little better IQ, and more AF points.

Any other points of comparison that I might want to be aware of?

Thanks,

-a
- Andrew

Who is wise? He who learns from everyone.
My SmugMug Site

Comments

  • GrainbeltGrainbelt Registered Users Posts: 478 Major grins
    edited February 23, 2012
    Looks like the T2i has will auto bracket exposures, has a higher resolution LCD screen, stereo recording for video mode, and a speaker for video playback. D3100 has wireless flash control.

    http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=canon_eos550d&products=nikon_d3100

    Beyond that they are almost alarmingly similar.

    The availability of the $200 Nikon 35mm F1.8 lens might be worth mentioning, if looking past the kit zooms at a fast standard prime. The cheap 50mm from Canon is pretty long on a crop sensor.
  • novicesnappernovicesnapper Registered Users Posts: 445 Major grins
    edited February 23, 2012
    One thing to consider is the lenses. Will the Nikon take the older lenses, vs the Canon with the EF-S mount which only uses the EF and IS series. Nikon has built in VR (vibration reduction)?, vs Canon, which puts it in the lenses. So, if the Nikon will take older lenses, they are automatically VR, vs Canon using older EF, no VR/IS. Yep, it does make a difference. If I had to do it over again, I would go Nikon, that's from a Cannon shooter.
  • Chuck289Chuck289 Registered Users Posts: 43 Big grins
    edited February 23, 2012
    One thing to consider is the lenses. Will the Nikon take the older lenses, vs the Canon with the EF-S mount which only uses the EF and IS series. Nikon has built in VR (vibration reduction)?, vs Canon, which puts it in the lenses. So, if the Nikon will take older lenses, they are automatically VR, vs Canon using older EF, no VR/IS. Yep, it does make a difference. If I had to do it over again, I would go Nikon, that's from a Cannon shooter.

    The Nikon doesn't have in-body VR. Same for Canon.
  • novicesnappernovicesnapper Registered Users Posts: 445 Major grins
    edited February 23, 2012
    Thanks Chuck, I wasn't sure, thus the question mark. I stand corrected lol. I would still go Nikon if I had it all to do all over lol. But that's just me lol. I'm actually contemplating picking up a low/mid end Nikon, to play with to compare OOTC images.
  • adbsgicomadbsgicom Registered Users Posts: 3,615 Major grins
    edited February 23, 2012
    Thanks for the info!
    - Andrew

    Who is wise? He who learns from everyone.
    My SmugMug Site
  • Brett1000Brett1000 Registered Users Posts: 819 Major grins
    edited February 24, 2012
    One thing to consider is the lenses. Will the Nikon take the older lenses, vs the Canon with the EF-S mount which only uses the EF and IS series. Nikon has built in VR (vibration reduction)?, vs Canon, which puts it in the lenses. So, if the Nikon will take older lenses, they are automatically VR, vs Canon using older EF, no VR/IS. Yep, it does make a difference. If I had to do it over again, I would go Nikon, that's from a Cannon shooter.

    huh??
    rolleyes1.gif
    Canon T2i (550D) takes all of the Canon lens - EF / EFS etc.
    Why would you think otherwise?
    Actually Nikon is confusing to me with lens with the screw drive, some with AF, etc.

    Both Canon and Nikon have IS /VR in the lens, not the body
    Comparison of Nikon vs Canon
    http://www.popphoto.com/gear/2010/05/camera-test-canon-eos-rebel-t2i
  • novicesnappernovicesnapper Registered Users Posts: 445 Major grins
    edited February 24, 2012
    Will Canon take Canon AI camera series (F mount?), older 35mm lenses? The old discontinued series, so no, Canon doesn't take ALL Canon lenses. ALL Rebel EOS lenses EF/EFS, WILL interchange, whether 35 or digital. My question in the quoted post, was will Nikon take older Nikon lenses? Can i buy a new Nikon and use 10-15 year old lenses on it? Or did they change mounts like Canon did, effectively killing the older lenses?
  • Brett1000Brett1000 Registered Users Posts: 819 Major grins
    edited February 24, 2012
    Will Canon take Canon AI camera series (F mount?), older 35mm lenses? The old discontinued series, so no, Canon doesn't take ALL Canon lenses. ALL Rebel EOS lenses EF/EFS, WILL interchange, whether 35 or digital. My question in the quoted post, was will Nikon take older Nikon lenses? Can i buy a new Nikon and use 10-15 year old lenses on it? Or did they change mounts like Canon did, effectively killing the older lenses?

    Do a search, Canon crop models (like the T2i) take all lens going back to the mid 1980's
    For Nikon look at a chart like this - (it gets complicated !)
    http://www.nikonians.org/nikon/slr-lens.html
  • ziggy53ziggy53 Super Moderators Posts: 24,156 moderator
    edited February 24, 2012
    Will Canon take Canon AI camera series (F mount?), older 35mm lenses? The old discontinued series, so no, Canon doesn't take ALL Canon lenses. ALL Rebel EOS lenses EF/EFS, WILL interchange, whether 35 or digital. My question in the quoted post, was will Nikon take older Nikon lenses? Can i buy a new Nikon and use 10-15 year old lenses on it? Or did they change mounts like Canon did, effectively killing the older lenses?

    Canon "FD" mount is the previous Canon manual focus lens mount, and it will not readily adapt to a newer Canon autofocus camera with the EF or EF-S mount, refardless of film or digital.

    All EF lenses "will" mount on all EF and EF-S mount bodies, but all Canon EF-S mount lenses will only safely mount directly onto Canon EF-S bodies. The "S" in the EF-S designation means "short backplane" and EF-S lenses may protrude too far into an EF camera body to be safe. EF-S bodies include all Canon dRebel series cameras, all xxD series bodies, and the 7D.

    In Nikon, it's a little trickier and best to resort to a compatibility chart:

    http://www.nikonians.org/nikon/slr-lens.html

    (Brett beat me to it.)

    The best lens compatibility of all manufacturers probably belongs to Pentax, because even lenses back to the Pentax M42/Universal screw mount may be simply adapted and safely mounted on modern Pentax bodies (with a few exceptions). Minolta is another manufacturer to maintain great compatibility with older lenses and newer bodies, including Sony bodies (which retain the Minolta "A" mount).
    ziggy53
    Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
  • novicesnappernovicesnapper Registered Users Posts: 445 Major grins
    edited February 24, 2012
    Thanks guys, I know if gets super confusing lol. Really appreciate those for sure. Only 4 hours sleep last night, a little foggy lol, even with coffee.
Sign In or Register to comment.