Off-topic: Digital music archive software question
Richard
Administrators, Vanilla Admin Posts: 19,962 moderator
I'm starting to think about buying a new machine for my photography work. I'd like to turn my current machine (ThinkPad T61, XP) into a music server--it would be permanently wired to my stereo system and I would transfer my 300 or so CDs to an external drive, probably using FLAC or some other lossless compression scheme.
So here's the question: Has anyone used any media management software that supports a remote user interface across a LAN? The idea is to control the selection and playback on the music machine from our laptops, both Windows and Macs. Nice to have (but not essential) would be something that also has a UI for mobile phones (Android). It would also be nice if the media manager could handle the ripping to FLAC.
Any suggestions?
So here's the question: Has anyone used any media management software that supports a remote user interface across a LAN? The idea is to control the selection and playback on the music machine from our laptops, both Windows and Macs. Nice to have (but not essential) would be something that also has a UI for mobile phones (Android). It would also be nice if the media manager could handle the ripping to FLAC.
Any suggestions?
0
Comments
- Squeezebox, owned by Logitec for a couple of years now.
- Sonos.
These systems are Wifi based and both do what you want except the ripping process. Squeezebox is the choice for audiophiles (the high end player is very good and the rest is surprisingly good) while the Sonos is more attractive to the Bose crowd. Sonos has great integrated units so player + amplifier and even units with speakers built in. The current Squeezebox offering on that end is just the "Radio" which is mono for in the kitchen or night stand (great unit though, very popular).
For ripping the CD's I have found that dBPowerAmp is the best system. Make sure you get all the metadata which can be automatic mostly with that software. The "AccurateRIP" technology is the key to success for correct RIPs and the access to the commercial metadata banks provides the joy of correct titles etc. so that you can find your music easily later on.
I have a master library in FLAC but have since converted it to iTunes ALAC which is also lossless. The squeezebox doesn't support that natively, so the server converts it to FLAC on the fly which is low-cpu demand with both formats being lossless.
Nick.
my equipment: Canon 5D2, 7D, full list here
my Smugmug site: here
There are actually some similar utililties that will work off a smart phone too or tablet too.
oops, just noticed you had discard desktop connection already...
http://www.danalphotos.com
http://www.pluralsight.com
http://twitter.com/d114
Although I think you should reconsider streaming player because the sound quality is multitudes better than that of the PC sound card, you can do it with the PC and have a wifi remote. For this you just install iTunes and download their remote control app.
Streaming is the norm like it was CD's before that. When we had CD's, one could also use 8-track cassettes but why find ways around the best and easiest solution ? Also, the streaming solution allows you to have multiple players, multiple zones, synchronize them with the same music or not etc. etc. It's a very flexible system and remotes are available for every gadget imaginable.
With the Squeezebox server, you can also find squeezeplayers that can be run on an old iPod touch or even on the server itself for output on the sound card. I would even consider hanging an iPad in a special wall frame to function as player with the cover art etc. showing, plus touch control of the system. Sonos can do all that too.
cheers,
Nick.
Nick.
my equipment: Canon 5D2, 7D, full list here
my Smugmug site: here
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
I do appreciate the suggestion.
How about tossing that Windows machine into the landfill it belongs in and putting a Mac Mini in the stereo rack instead? I did that before the 2nd generation Apple TV. I hated having a keyboard and a mouse in the living room though. On the other hand, I didn't like the 1st generation Apple TV.
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
iTunes on Windoze is pretty bad, I agree.
A quick scan on Amazon shows me that it's either the Apple TV for $99.- which requires a MacMini making it a $600.- operation (while that also gets you video etc.) or you have the Squeezebox Touch which will work fine with the Windows PC (as far as Windoze can work fine) and costs $300.- Both can use similar devices for remote control. Sonos costs more.
All the rest you will hate after a couple of days... been there, done that.
Nick.
my equipment: Canon 5D2, 7D, full list here
my Smugmug site: here
Is iTunes on Windows so bad that you would not want iTunes on Windows to serve the Apple TV????
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
Both my Pastor's wife and my eldest daughter had problems with their respective machines running slowly and locking up (Vista and XP, respectively). When I removed iTunes, the machines started being usable again.
I was running iTunes on my much more current Win 7 box. When I saw the results of removing iTunes from the other machines, I also removed it from my machine and restored some stability.
I have to surmise that iTunes for Windows is poorly written. (It did cleanly remove itself, however.)
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
I think that once you have the Apple TV, or anything else from Apple for that matter, you will be glad to get rid of the Windows machines you have. Like the other poster wrote, there's good places where those belong like dumpsters, ditches etc.
I just helped somebody sync ebooks between iTunes on Windows laptop and his iPad and it was really really bad but did work in the end... kinda...
Nick.
my equipment: Canon 5D2, 7D, full list here
my Smugmug site: here
I just installed the free version of RealVNC server on the Windows machine and was able to control Winamp on it from a browser tab on the Macbook. It's probably going to take a little tweaking for ease of use, since the ThinkPad has a higher resolution screen than the Mac, but that shouldn't be a big deal to sort out.
The best remote desktop I know of works with iPhone/iPad/iPod remotes and is called SplashTop. It even works with watching a movie, incl. audio. Splashtop will switch to the resolution of the iPad automatically.
You are correct that you don't need extra hardware when the audio output quality meets your requirements.
Nick.
my equipment: Canon 5D2, 7D, full list here
my Smugmug site: here
Hello Richard.
I believe I understand what you are trying to do but I want to spell it back to you as I got confused as the thread went on. You have a computer that is running a Windows XP OS.
You want to place your audio, not video just audio, onto an external hard drive connected to your computer and connect your computer to your amplifier to reproduce your audio. The solution would allow for you to control your system remotely not transport the audio streams. It should also provide a way to manage your media.
What you are describing is very doable and not that complex from my experience - which excludes Android but I believe that the same approach would work just don't know what software is available.
You are looking for a Home Theater Personal Computer (HTPC) not a Media Server. I know it is splitting hairs. Like you I am frugal and have spare machines laying around so I see no reason to down convert to stream or waste my bandwidth when I can put the content local easily enough.
Your solution of using VNC is right on and I use it personally at home to do the exact same thing you are doing. There are HTPC control apps such as Signal (http://www.alloysoft.com/) which I have not used, but the idea is to have a client that controls the player remotely. So what I have done is used my Mac and Windows machines to control my Windows HTPC using Remote Desktop. Yup just the built in remote desktop. There is a Mac client for it as well as the Windows client. I have also tried VNC with success using Tight VNC for laptops and Real VNC but I have not tried the mobile apps. The best results, both in terms of audio quality and controllability has been RDC to the media player computer. I am doing it right now.
However in the past few months I have migrated to having a MacBookPro as my media server and HTPC for my office and that has worked ideally using RDC, VNC, and Remote with iOS. However you indicated that you just want a workstation that is a player. If you are still unhappy with that solution you can look at getting Media Center if you are a MSDN or upgrade to Windows 7 which has Media Center and then there is a standard for the remote but I am frugal and would do the VNC solution first.
You also indicated that you are doing this as an archive solution if you are truly looking at archiving I would not use any compression as storage is cheap. The CD standard is 700MB which when ripped as a canonical stereo WAV file is 700MB. So 300 CDs at .7GB each still puts you at about 210GB not a very expensive drive. I can go through all the reasons it is better than a compressed storage but I think you get it. Now if you want to look at improvements in your connectivity so that the weak link is not the connection from your computer to the amplifier I can help you with that as well.
Pictures | Website | Blog | Twitter | Contact
You're take is exactly right and I'm pleased to hear that the solution I'm considering actually works for someone. You're right, of course, that technically it's not a music server (unless I'm the client). You're also right about the storage requirements being small enough that even lossless compression might be unnecessary. I haven't thought yet about how I will work the music archive into my overall backup scheme--archive size might matter there, dunno. I looked at the Signal app, which is kind of cool. It might come in handy if they do an Android version (or if I get assimilated and buy an iPhone ), but it does not seem to have a browser based client, so it's not going to be my primary solution. I'm not really sure I need a mobile client at all--I just like to think as broadly as possible at the design stage to avoid painting myself into a corner a few years down the road.
I appreciate the feedback and the information.
Pictures | Website | Blog | Twitter | Contact
Edit: OK, so I looked at USB audio thingies, but they mostly seem to want to add fake surround sound effects, which does not interest me at all. They do have analog outputs. They're pretty cheap--are there any that really do improve sound quality? The laptop's CODEC is AD1984HD (24 bit, 192KHz), but I don't know anything about the D/A converter.
This is about what I tried to say at the start of the thread.. the sound quality of the internal audio is mediocre, however, for you it is good enough, in which case you don't need any additional hardware.
The wifi streaming of audio and video is a step beyond the home theater PC that you're about to set up (I did away with it 3 years ago), and I guess all steps need to be taken.
I would not be able to stand internal laptop DAC for 2 minutes. The difference with the D/A conversion in a Squeezebox or external USB DAC is like heaven from hell. It is not just which DAC chip.. it is the components used around it as much if not more, that define end results.
Another thing is how you get the music on the PC to play in the bedroom, kitchen, garden etc. I need music wherever I spend time. This used to be done with heaps of cabling but all that is replaced by wifi too.
Nick.
my equipment: Canon 5D2, 7D, full list here
my Smugmug site: here